1988
DOI: 10.1093/sw/33.3.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Bias in Mental Health Evaluation of Deaf Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internalization, in turn, was predicted to be detrimental to one’s self-esteem (Cooley, 1956; Merton, 1948). Given that the attitudes of the hearing majority toward deaf people are mostly negative (e.g., Blood & Blood, 1982; Cowen, Bobrove, Rockway, & Stevenson, 1967; Dickert, 1988; Lane, 1992), it is predicted that deaf people should have lower levels of self-esteem than hearing people (H1).…”
Section: Self-esteem In Members Of Minority Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internalization, in turn, was predicted to be detrimental to one’s self-esteem (Cooley, 1956; Merton, 1948). Given that the attitudes of the hearing majority toward deaf people are mostly negative (e.g., Blood & Blood, 1982; Cowen, Bobrove, Rockway, & Stevenson, 1967; Dickert, 1988; Lane, 1992), it is predicted that deaf people should have lower levels of self-esteem than hearing people (H1).…”
Section: Self-esteem In Members Of Minority Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that misconceptions about the etiology of mental health among deaf persons contribute significantly to stigma and biased psychiatric evaluation and treatment of deaf patients. It has been reported that even though deaf and hearing patients have similar psychiatric symptoms, the deaf patients were given more dosage of medication, had longer stay in the hospital, and more clinical supervision than their hearing counterparts, which also contribute to stigma [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result much of the literature is also critical of the accuracy of deaf assessments cautioning high false-positive or false-negative diagnostic error rates (e.g., Monteiro & Neeney, 1992, cited in Young et al, 2001. This diagnostic error has also been examined experimentally by Dickert (1988). O' Rourke and Grewer (2005) suggest that unreliable assessment have a negative impact on formulation and treatment.…”
Section: Deaf Patient Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 90%