2015
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2015.1072864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Cataloging Assessment Values Using the Q Sort Method

Abstract: The intent of this project was to identify whether there is a gap between catalogers' personal values related to cataloging assessment and their perceptions of their institutions' values. This article uses Q methodology to contrast those perspectives. The Q-statements for this study were based on the discourse represented in a literature review of articles related to cataloging assessment. A factor analysis of Q-sorts was used to identify themes in participant perceptions. The patterns identified support the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most unique euphuism was "differently-abled" (Copeland 2011), which is likely a reflection of the fact that there currently exists no appropriate disability subject cataloging vocabularies, tough there are a number of glossaries (Disabled People's Association of Singapore 2015; National Center on Disability and Journalism 2018) and one study on disability tags (MacKenzie Johnson and Forsythe 2019). In recent years however, disability has been discussed by a number of authors in LIS fields, most notably Schomberg (2014;Brilmeyer (2018a;2018b;, but includes others (Koford 2014;M. A. Adler, Huber, and Nix 2017;Robinson 2017;Hollich 2020;Dali and Caidi 2021, (various chapters)).…”
Section: Disability and Crip Komentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most unique euphuism was "differently-abled" (Copeland 2011), which is likely a reflection of the fact that there currently exists no appropriate disability subject cataloging vocabularies, tough there are a number of glossaries (Disabled People's Association of Singapore 2015; National Center on Disability and Journalism 2018) and one study on disability tags (MacKenzie Johnson and Forsythe 2019). In recent years however, disability has been discussed by a number of authors in LIS fields, most notably Schomberg (2014;Brilmeyer (2018a;2018b;, but includes others (Koford 2014;M. A. Adler, Huber, and Nix 2017;Robinson 2017;Hollich 2020;Dali and Caidi 2021, (various chapters)).…”
Section: Disability and Crip Komentioning
confidence: 99%