“…While few had used any pharmacy PH services, many were willing to use them once they became aware of what was offered. This echoes other studies that have shown that pharmacy services are not fully utilised and are not well advertised …”
The public are using digital mediums for health advice instead of speaking to an HCP. If CPs want to have an impact on public health they must start imbedding digital mediums into their services.
“…While few had used any pharmacy PH services, many were willing to use them once they became aware of what was offered. This echoes other studies that have shown that pharmacy services are not fully utilised and are not well advertised …”
The public are using digital mediums for health advice instead of speaking to an HCP. If CPs want to have an impact on public health they must start imbedding digital mediums into their services.
“…Pharmacists commonly voiced concerns over the lack of awareness of extended services particularly by patients and members of the public, but also among GPs. Studies reporting GP views confirmed their low awareness of extended services (Agomo, Portlock, & Ogunleye, ; Bradley, Ashcroft, & Noyce, ; Latif et al., ; Saramunee et al., ). Pharmacists believed that a lack of well‐defined roles made their responsibilities unclear to patients and GPs and led to services being perceived as crossing GP boundaries (Butterworth et al., ; Horsfield, Sheridan, & Anderson, ; Mantzourani, Richards, & Hughes, ; Morton, Pattison, Langley, & Powell, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…GPs were generally less positive about extended pharmacy services (Atkins et al., ; Latif et al., ; Porteous & Bond, ; Wilcock & Harding, ). Some GPs did not see extended pharmacy services as a priority for them (Wilcock & Harding, ), were not convinced that these services reduced their workload (Atkins et al., ; Latif et al., ; Porteous & Bond, ) and preferred services to be simplified (Porteous & Bond, ; Wilcock & Harding, ). Even when GPs were supportive of community pharmacy services (Blenkinsopp, Tann, Evans, & Grime, ; Michie, Cameron, Glasier, & Greed, ; Morecroft et al., ; Wilcock & Harding, ), this was associated with suggestions that they supervised and authorised pharmacists’ activities (Blenkinsopp et al., ; Bradley et al., ; Maddox, Halsall, Hall, & Tully, ; Michie et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They acknowledged the need for community pharmacies to employ sufficient pharmacy staff to be able to manage and distribute responsibilities to provide a range of extended services. At times, pharmacists were reluctant to approach patients/provide extended services due to high workload (Evans, Wood, & Carter, ; Horsfield et al., ; Michie et al., ; Sohanpal et al., ) which was mainly linked to dispensing duties (Latif et al., ; Ogunbayo et al., ; Saramunee et al., ; Tucker & Stewart, ). Some reconfigured service delivery (Latif et al., ; Morton et al., ; Sohanpal et al., ) or prioritised information provided due to high workload (Sturrock, Preshaw, Hayes, & Wilkes, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite both pharmacists and GPs acknowledging the importance of collaboration to optimise the provision of extended services, they commonly perceived collaboration to be poor. This perception was influenced by GPs’ negative attitudes towards pharmacists (Agomo, Ogunleye, & Portlock, 2016b; Campion et al., ; Evans et al., ; George et al., 2006b; Latif et al., ; Urban et al., ; Wilcock & Harding, ), GPs being suspicious of pharmacists’ financial motives (Urban et al., ) and competition for services (Agomo et al., 2016b; Evans et al., ; Latif et al., ; Wilcock & Harding, ). Examples of poor engagement included lack of GP availability (Mackridge, Beynon, McVeigh, Whitfield, & Chandler, ; Savage et al., ), patient referrals (Latif et al., ; Lucas & Blenkinsopp, ; Pumtong et al., ) and feedback (Akram et al., ; Urban et al., ).…”
There has been a strong policy emphasis over the past decade on optimising patient-centred care and reducing general practitioners' (GPs') workload by extending community pharmacy services and collaboration between pharmacists and GPs. Our aim was to review current evidence of pharmacists' and GPs' views of extended community pharmacy services and pharmacists' roles in the United Kingdom (UK). A systematic review was undertaken looking at UK studies investigating pharmacists' and/or GPs' views of community pharmacy services or roles from 2005 to 2017. A range of databases were searched including EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PsycINFO, Science Direct and The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). In addition, reference lists of included studies were screened and grey literature was searched. Following the application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, the quality of papers was critically analysed, findings were extracted into a grid and subjected to narrative synthesis following thematic analysis. The search strategy yielded a total of 4,066 unique papers from which 60 were included. Forty-seven papers covered pharmacists' views, nine combined both pharmacists' and GPs' views and four covered GPs' views. Study designs included interviews (n = 31, 52%), questionnaire surveys (n = 17, 28%) and focus groups (n = 7, 12%). Three main themes emerged from the data: "attitudes towards services/roles", "community pharmacy organisations" and "external influences". Pharmacists and GPs perceived a number of barriers to successful implementation and integration of pharmacy services. Moreover, collaboration between pharmacists and GPs remains poor despite the introduction of extended services. Overall, extending community pharmacy services require quality-driven incentives and joint working between community pharmacists and GPs to achieve better integration within the patient's primary care pathway.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.