2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2010.00260.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of facilitators and barriers to home‐based supplemental feeding with ready‐to‐use food for underweight children in western Uganda

Abstract: Poor complementary feeding practices and low quality complementary foods are significant causes of growth faltering and child mortality throughout the developing world. Ready-to-use foods (RUF) are energy dense, lipid-based products that do not require cooking or refrigeration, that have been used to prevent and treat malnutrition among vulnerable children. The effectiveness of these products in improving child nutritional status depends on household use by caregivers. To identify the key facilitators and barr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential confounders in the regression models were selected based on findings from an earlier qualitative study (Ickes et al . ) and theoretical knowledge of factors that influence children's diets in developing countries (Black et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential confounders in the regression models were selected based on findings from an earlier qualitative study (Ickes et al . ) and theoretical knowledge of factors that influence children's diets in developing countries (Black et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Ickes et al . ). Further, caregivers in this remote setting found it difficult to attend weekly programme sessions because of the opportunity costs of foregone household responsibilities, as well as a long commuting distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overall, 121 (81%) children had SAM and 28 (19%) had MAM. Nearly 51% of the included children had received PPN for 3 weeks and the remainder had received it for >3 weeks (range [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies in Africa have shown that peanut-based RUTF has good acceptability and compliance among severely malnourished children, 10-12 other studies have demonstrated barriers to its use and inadequate compliance, mainly due to sharing within the households. 13,14 There is, however, limited published literature on PPN acceptability in South Asia.In the present study, we assessed the acceptability of PPN among 1) care givers of malnourished children and 2) community health workers (CHWs), in Kamrangirchar slum, Dhaka, Bangladesh. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the acceptability of LNS with peanut as a main ingredient has also been confirmed in a number of trials in Africa, including in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, Niger, Uganda and Zimbabwe (Flax et al 2009;Adu-Afarwuah et al 2011;Hess et al 2011;Parker et al 2011;Phuka et al 2011;Tripp et al 2011;Cohuet et al 2012;Ickes et al 2012;Paul et al 2012). Peanut-flavoured LNS have also been found acceptable in other regions [Haiti (Heidkamp et al 2012); Guatemala (Matias et al 2011); and Bangladesh (Mridha et al 2012)].…”
Section: Box 2 Key Considerations For Ingredients In Lnsmentioning
confidence: 87%