2018 Design of Medical Devices Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1115/dmd2018-6872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Fluid-Structure Interaction in Stent Grafts and its Hemodynamic Implications

Abstract: Every year in the United States, 4,500 deaths occur from abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. Aneurysms develop when the arterial wall weakens. Many risk factors can contribute to aneurysm formation, including age, sex, ethnicity, smoking and hypertension [1]. AAAs are the most common form of aneurysm because the aorta experiences the highest wall shear stress (WSS) of any vessels in the human body. These aneurysms are 5–6% prevalent in men and 1–2% in women, both over 65 years of age [2]. In the aorta, hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 36 Other studies have also shown minimal differences between rigid vs deformable wall simulations on calculated hemodynamic parameters in the abdominal aorta. 37 Results from our study may also differ depending on overall graft designs using different manufacturers with varying graft geometry with respect to diameters and lengths of tapered segments or fenestration/branch portal diameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“… 36 Other studies have also shown minimal differences between rigid vs deformable wall simulations on calculated hemodynamic parameters in the abdominal aorta. 37 Results from our study may also differ depending on overall graft designs using different manufacturers with varying graft geometry with respect to diameters and lengths of tapered segments or fenestration/branch portal diameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“… 38 However, it has been shown that the differences between rigid wall and fluid-solid interaction deformable wall simulations have minimal impact on calculated hemodynamic parameters in the abdominal aorta, with tWSS and oscillatory shear index values differing only by approximately 5% between methods. 39 Nonetheless, hemodynamic analysis is not able to calculate force vectors affecting the stent structure from either pulsatile or respiratory-induced motion. These external forces are key factors as they pertain to mechanical methods of graft failure, such as material fatigue and stent fracture, and are better investigated using other analytical or bench models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid resolution varied from 2 564 019 to 4 178 775 cells with approximately 2 000 000 to 4 000 000 tetrahedral elements in the core region and five prismatic layers in the boundary layers near the wall. The arterial wall was assumed as the rigid wall with a non‐slip boundary condition, and it is shown that there is a negligible difference between rigid and compliant wall 29 . Blood was considered to be incompressible, and a Newtonian fluid with a density of 1050 kg/m 3 and a dynamic viscosity of 0.00365 kg m −1 s 30 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%