2014
DOI: 10.14696/jcs.2014.12.14.4.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Influential Factors of Tablet PC Use - Application of Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, smartphone has been said to be a close substitute to tablets because of their many shared interfaces and functionality (Tofel, 2012). On the other hand, some studies at the individual level support the notion that tablets and smartphones have a complementary relationship (Son et al, 2014;Song & Lee, 2012). Two products are seen as complementary when, using together, one can add or enhance the value/functions of the other (Ha & Ganahl, 2004).…”
Section: Price Factor -Complementary Device V Substitutive Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, smartphone has been said to be a close substitute to tablets because of their many shared interfaces and functionality (Tofel, 2012). On the other hand, some studies at the individual level support the notion that tablets and smartphones have a complementary relationship (Son et al, 2014;Song & Lee, 2012). Two products are seen as complementary when, using together, one can add or enhance the value/functions of the other (Ha & Ganahl, 2004).…”
Section: Price Factor -Complementary Device V Substitutive Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementarity encourages dual adoption/ownership. A recent consumer level study suggests that the relationship between tablet PCs and smartphones is complementary in terms of functionality for smart devices, at least in the market's initial stage (Son et al, 2014). Song and Lee (2012) also found that people show strong intention to own both a tablet and a smartphone.…”
Section: Price Factor -Complementary Device V Substitutive Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This key concept of the model suggests that the evaluation of the use of wearable health care devices (ie, when performance expectancy exceeds effort expectancy) would lead to a decision on device acceptance [ 17 ]. Similar to Son et al [ 39 ], we developed items to measure effort expectancy (ie, the degree of perceived ease of use). We hypothesized that effort expectancy would affect performance expectancy and the intention of continued use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%