The condensation of enantiopure (1R,2R)‐(–)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane with two equivalents of 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6‐carbaldehyde followed by reduction with NaBH4 allows the facile synthesis of the enantiopure hexadentate ligand (R,R)‐3. Each tridentate metal‐binding domain in (R,R)‐3 exhibits a degree of flexibility arising from inversion at the amine nitrogen centre and rotation about N–C and C–C single bonds. This leads to the formation of either M‐[M{(R,R)‐3}]2+ or P‐[M{(R,R)‐3}]2+. The solid‐state structures of the copper(II), iron(II) and zinc(II) complexes of (R,R)‐3 all show a preference for M‐[M{(R,R)‐3}]2+. In solution, [Fe{(R,R)‐3}]2+ exists predominantly as one diastereoisomer (assumed to be the M‐form). The preference for the M‐ over P‐form is rationalized in terms of a favourable anti configuration of the NH and cyclohexane‐1,2‐diyl CH hydrogen atoms in the M‐form, and an unfavourable syn‐configuration in the P‐form. When (R,R)‐4, the Schiff base analogue of (R,R)‐3, combines with zinc(II) or silver(I), [2+2] double helicates with M‐chirality assemble in the solid state. With (S,S)‐4, iron(II) also assembles into a dinuclear, double helicate with M‐handedness. Complete stereoselectivity is observed in solution with NMR spectroscopic data indicating the presence of one diastereoisomer. The preference for a dinuclear over mononuclear helicate can be traced to a decrease in ligand flexibility on going from 3 (saturated backbone) to 4 (unsaturated imine backbone).