2017
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the Weighted Root Mean Square Residual: Evidence for Trustworthiness?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
189
0
32

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
189
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the final model was selected based on the weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) as the fit index. According to Yu and Muthén () and DiStefano, Liu, Jiang, and Shi (), a good fitting model has WRMR values below 0.9. The current model had a WRMR value of 0.53, thus indicating a good fit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the final model was selected based on the weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) as the fit index. According to Yu and Muthén () and DiStefano, Liu, Jiang, and Shi (), a good fitting model has WRMR values below 0.9. The current model had a WRMR value of 0.53, thus indicating a good fit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RMSEA ranges from 0 to 1.0, with .08 or less indicating adequate model fit. WRMR ranges from 0 to 1, with lower values indicating better model fit (DiStefano, Liu, Jiang, & Shi, 2018). Although there is less simulation research on the WRMR, preliminary evaluation suggests a value of 1.0 or less indicates adequate model fit.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values ≥0.90 were seen as acceptable and values ≥0.95 as good model fit for the CFI and TLI, whereas RMSEA values ≤0.80 and ≤0.50 were considered as acceptable and good model fit, respectively (Browne & Cudeck, 1992;Hu & Bentler, 1999). For the WRMR, estimates around one were seen as good model fit (DiStefano, Liu, Jiang, & Shi, 2018;Yu, 2002). The difference in fit between the 3-factor and 2-factor models was statistically tested using the Mplus DIFFTEST procedure, which computes differences in χ 2 values of nested models.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%