2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004ja010744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of type II origin with SOHO/LASCO observations

Abstract: [1] We examine a possibility that metric type II solar radio bursts are all caused by coronal mass ejection (CME) generated shocks. For this we consider 129 type II flare events from February 1997 to October 2000 and examine their associations with SOHO/LASCO CMEs according to their temporal and spatial closeness using SOHO/EIT and GOES data. We then carefully inspected 26 CME-less events to examine if there are CME-related features in LASCO and EIT images. In addition we examined 28 limb type II CME events to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Type II burst speed was found to be super-Alfvénic (e.g., Vršnak & Cliver 2008;Cho et al 2005;Klein et al 1999). Furthermore, the decelerating phase of the Type II shock can be related with the fading of the Type II burst in the dynamic spectrum as the shock approaches the local Alfvén speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Type II burst speed was found to be super-Alfvénic (e.g., Vršnak & Cliver 2008;Cho et al 2005;Klein et al 1999). Furthermore, the decelerating phase of the Type II shock can be related with the fading of the Type II burst in the dynamic spectrum as the shock approaches the local Alfvén speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICME transit times shown as a function of a) CME expansion speed (S-sample), b) CME plane-of-sky speed (H-sample), c) solar wind velocity (S-sample -black, H-sample -gray). The power-law least-square fit parameters are given in the insets, together with the correlation coefficient c. Cane & Richardson 2003a;Cho et al 2003;Manoharan et al 2004;Michałek et al 2004;Srivastava & Venkatakrishnan 2004;Schwenn et al 2005;Xie et al 2006). Transit times of slow CMEs range around 100 h, whereas they are grouped around 40 h in the case of the fastest CMEs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the T T (v CME ) correlation is burdened by large scatter of T T values at a given v CME . The overall scatter of data points at a given v CME usually ranges around ± 1 day (see the distribution of data points in T T (v CME ) graphs in, e.g., Gopalswamy et al 2000;Gopalswamy et al 2003;Cane & Richardson 2003a;Cho et al 2003;Manoharan et al 2004;Michałek et al 2004;Srivastava & Venkatakrishnan 2004;Xie et al 2006). As emphasized by, e.g., Michałek et al (2003), Xie et al (2004), and Schwenn et al (2005), the prime reason for such a large scatter might be the difference between the measured plane-of-sky speed and the true space velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies of the possible association of SRBT II with either flares or CMEs [153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162]. SRBT II has extensively studied to understand their sources and in connection with CMEs and Solar Energetic Particles (SEP) events [50,163] based on signatures of the shock-associated plasma oscillate signatures of type II bursts occurred near off after the maximum of chromosphere flare.…”
Section: Volume 35mentioning
confidence: 99%