Examinee perceptions of the usefulness of performance feedback on an examination for medical licensure

Leone-Perkins, Megan; Dillon, Gerard F.; Walsh, William P.

doi:10.1097/00001888-199610000-00054

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even without IRT, a report that presents a number of scores by specific sub-topics can provide more useful feedback than a single overall score 18 . The common practice of providing only one raw score across assessment components has been criticised in medical education research 12,19 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Graphical Item Maps: providing clearer feedback on professional exam performance

Beaves¹,

Wallace²,

Zoanetti³

et al. 2018

MedEdPublish

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Structured feedback is an important component of learning and assessment and is highly valued by candidates. Unfortunately, item specific feedback is generally not feasible for high stakes professional assessments due to the high cost of item development and the need to maintain stable assessment performance characteristics. In a high stakes assessment of fetal surveillance knowledge, we sought to use graphical item mapping to allow informative candidate feedback without compromising the item bank.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%