2011
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Antecedent Control over Emergent Mands and Tacts in Young Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(29 reference statements)
6
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, mands emerged under standard antecedent conditions, thus indicating that modified antecedent conditions were not required for posttraining mand emergence. These findings are consistent with previous research demonstrating initial emergence of mand/tact verbal operants following training in the other operant (Egan & Barnes-Holmes, 2008;Petursdottir et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, mands emerged under standard antecedent conditions, thus indicating that modified antecedent conditions were not required for posttraining mand emergence. These findings are consistent with previous research demonstrating initial emergence of mand/tact verbal operants following training in the other operant (Egan & Barnes-Holmes, 2008;Petursdottir et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically, the initial functional independence observed in standard antecedent conditions during posttraining probes was subsequently overcome by the introduction of the modified antecedent. Notably, these findings are consistent with previous research indicating that antecedent conditions control the emergence of untrained mand or tact operants following training in the other operant (Egan & Barnes-Holmes, 2008, 2009). The authors concluded that the modified antecedent functioned as a verbal discriminative stimulus that cued participants to respond in the context of the experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations