2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-021-00686-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining bivalve fecundity: oocyte viability revealed by Neutral Red vital staining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the estimation of potential annual fecundity is critical to understand bivalve production and population dynamics, it is little explored [65]. Chamelea gallina is characterized by indeterminate fecundity, or better by a potential annual fecundity that is not known before the onset of spawning, since unyolked oocytes continue to mature and be spawned throughout the reproductive season [66].…”
Section: Reproductive Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the estimation of potential annual fecundity is critical to understand bivalve production and population dynamics, it is little explored [65]. Chamelea gallina is characterized by indeterminate fecundity, or better by a potential annual fecundity that is not known before the onset of spawning, since unyolked oocytes continue to mature and be spawned throughout the reproductive season [66].…”
Section: Reproductive Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total inviable = Atresic or abnormal + dead oocytes. Data from Beninger et al (2021) and present work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, oocyte numbers do not translate directly to fecundity, unless some measure of oocyte viability is known. The most widespread indicator of cellular viability is the neutral red (NR) vital stain, first developed by Ehrlich (1894), and used extensively since the 1970s, both in the medical sciences (e.g., Liu et al, 2018) and for marine plankton (Da Luz et al, 2016; Dressel et al, 1972, and see Beninger et al, 2021 for review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations