2019
DOI: 10.1101/797142
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining go-or-grow using fluorescent cell-cycle indicators and cell cycle-inhibiting drugs

Abstract: The go-or-grow hypothesis states that adherent cells undergo reversible phenotype switching between migratory and proliferative states, with cells in the migratory state being more motile than cells in the proliferative state. Here, we examine go-or-grow using melanoma cells with fluorescent cell-cycle indicators and cell cycle-inhibiting drugs. We analyse the experimental data using single-cell tracking to calculate mean diffusivities, and compare motility between cells in different cell-cycle phases and in c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such noise in the distribution of molecules may affect cell-fate and drive non-genetic heterogeneity [28][29][30], leading to different phenotypic distributions in terms of EMT [3]. While EMT is believed to repress the cell cycle [76,77], this association remains controversial [78]. Thus, noise in the partitioning of parent cell biomolecules among the daughter cells can further alter the subpopulation structure, and may underlie different bimodal distributions of surface CDH1 expression seen in breast cancer cell lines [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such noise in the distribution of molecules may affect cell-fate and drive non-genetic heterogeneity [28][29][30], leading to different phenotypic distributions in terms of EMT [3]. While EMT is believed to repress the cell cycle [76,77], this association remains controversial [78]. Thus, noise in the partitioning of parent cell biomolecules among the daughter cells can further alter the subpopulation structure, and may underlie different bimodal distributions of surface CDH1 expression seen in breast cancer cell lines [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models of a dichotomy between proliferation and migration are numerous [27][28][29], but whether the two phenotypes are indeed mutually exclusive remains controversial [30]. Our efforts to use mathematical modeling to inform what cost high-ploidy cells (goers) pay for their robustness builds upon these prior works.…”
Section: Overall Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special case applies when the energy diffusion coefficient is very large relative to cell movement, in which case neither chemotaxis nor haptotaxis occurs. All these energetic contingencies determine whether phenotypic differences between goers and growers manifest as such, and explain why non-proliferative arrested cells can have the same motility as cycling cells [30]. A future extension will be to integrate our model of the potential cost of high ploidy with existing Markov models of the robustness benefits it can provide against deleterious mutations [22,31,32].…”
Section: Overall Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given suitable initial conditions, r(x, 0) and g(x, 0), and parameter values θ, Equations Despite the abundance of experimental data in Figure 1 and the apparent simplicity of Equations (3)-(4), it is unclear whether these experimental data are sufficient to provide reasonable estimates of the four parameters: θ = (D r , D g , k r , k g ). Therefore, we also consider a simpler model whereby we set D r = D g = D, implying that cells in G1 phase diffuse at the same rate as cells in S/G2/M phase [42]. This simpler model is characterised by just three unknown parameters: θ = (D, k r , k g ).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%