2016
DOI: 10.7249/rr1328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining ISIS Support and Opposition Networks on Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is a way to visualize not only who is talking to whom but also what they are talking (and care) about. The result was a social media map of the argument space around ISIL (Bodine- Baron, Helmus, et al, 2016). Figure 3.1 shows a map of the top-level metacommunities discovered in that study, along with the density and direction of connections between them.…”
Section: Publics Analysis: Mapping the Argument Space In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This approach is a way to visualize not only who is talking to whom but also what they are talking (and care) about. The result was a social media map of the argument space around ISIL (Bodine- Baron, Helmus, et al, 2016). Figure 3.1 shows a map of the top-level metacommunities discovered in that study, along with the density and direction of connections between them.…”
Section: Publics Analysis: Mapping the Argument Space In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond describing the social networks of an extremist group like ISIL, the combination of SNA and lexical analysis can be used to characterize the ideological struggle over ISIL occurring on social media (Bodine- Baron, Helmus, et al, 2016). 4 This approach uses a community detection algorithm to identify the groups involved and lexical analysis to characterize those communities.…”
Section: Publics Analysis: Mapping the Argument Space In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2015, the RAND Corporation funded a study to examine the networks of ISIS supporters and opponents on Twitter, the results of which were published in 2016. 1 That study found that, despite overwhelming numbers, opponents to ISIS are deeply fractured along both sectarian and national lines, while ISIS supporters, though fewer in number, are more coordinated and sophisticated in their use of social media.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%