2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining labelling effects within discrete choice experiments: An application to recreational site choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most RBDs we find a pattern of decreasing association from walking-boating-fishing-swimming, but in the Northumbrian and Anglian RBDs this pattern is reversed. Detailed exploration of these regional differences is beyond the scope of this paper, but as potential explanations we suggest regional idiosyncrasies in (i) demography, with younger people being more critical of water quality [49], (ii) frequency of recreational water use, with more frequent water users more sensitive to differences in water status [52], (iii) relative importance of site choice factors, in that residents of more urbanized RBDs may be less sensitive to water status, (iv) differences in typical travel distances (willingness to travel farther) for different populations in different regions of England, (v) attachment to specific sites irrespective of water quality, through force of habit [53,54] or marketing of specific sites [55]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most RBDs we find a pattern of decreasing association from walking-boating-fishing-swimming, but in the Northumbrian and Anglian RBDs this pattern is reversed. Detailed exploration of these regional differences is beyond the scope of this paper, but as potential explanations we suggest regional idiosyncrasies in (i) demography, with younger people being more critical of water quality [49], (ii) frequency of recreational water use, with more frequent water users more sensitive to differences in water status [52], (iii) relative importance of site choice factors, in that residents of more urbanized RBDs may be less sensitive to water status, (iv) differences in typical travel distances (willingness to travel farther) for different populations in different regions of England, (v) attachment to specific sites irrespective of water quality, through force of habit [53,54] or marketing of specific sites [55]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A, B, C, …) and respondents differentiate among the proposed alternatives only through the attributes and their levels. While labeled alternatives may make the choice task more concrete for respondents, recent contributions find evidence that a proportion of respondents chose on the basis of the label only (Doherty et al ., ), and that unlabeled DCEs may be more suitable to investigate tradeoffs between attributes (Bekker‐Grob et al ., ). Such tradeoffs appear to be important in our investigation as one of our aims is to highlight priorities for the future policies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of trust, individuals tend to conserve cognitive energy in their decisionmaking processes (Kahneman and Frederick 2002;Doherty, Campbell, Hynes and van Rensburg, 2013) by passively assessing information (Tost 2011). In the passive mode, an individual does not engage in rigorous evaluation.…”
Section: And Third Party Certificationmentioning
confidence: 99%