2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining measurement reactivity in daily diary data on substance use: Results from a randomized experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a recent randomized experimental study also demonstrated that daily monitoring of substance use had either no significant measurement reactivity or had some short-term reactivity (i.e. 1 week) depending on the substance use outcomes [54]. Fifthly, the present study did not measure diagnostic information on chronic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In addition, a recent randomized experimental study also demonstrated that daily monitoring of substance use had either no significant measurement reactivity or had some short-term reactivity (i.e. 1 week) depending on the substance use outcomes [54]. Fifthly, the present study did not measure diagnostic information on chronic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Of those who reported that they reflected more about their substance use, there were no detectable changes in substance use after starting to respond to mNCANDA assessments. In a randomized study, Buu et al [ 54 ] found reactivity to a long-term repeated assessment of recent substance use was limited to the first week of monitoring, where the frequency of alcohol use increased but quantity decreased. In contrast, self-monitoring is a mechanism leveraged by substance use interventions [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…diary reactivity, Bolger & Laurenceau, 2013). However, for addictive behaviour, the reactivity has been found to become stable after one week (Buu et al, 2020). Second, to reduce participant burden, we used single-item measures for self-and other-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%