2019
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Mid‐Upper Arm Circumference Malnutritionz‐Score Thresholds

Abstract: Background Anthropometric z‐scores used commonly for diagnosis and determining degree of malnutrition, specifically body mass index (BMIz), weight‐for‐length (WLz), and mid‐upper arm circumference (MUACz), are not wholly concordant, yet the proposed thresholds for classification are identical. This study was designed to critically examine MUACz thresholds and their ability to correctly classify nutrition status. Methods This was a 2‐year, prospective single‐center study of children ≤18 years seen by registered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAC and BMI, though cannot differentiate between fat and muscle mass, have been useful anthropometry parameters for PEW assessment in children with CKD. [ 3 15 16 17 ] Though MAC has been noted to be useful for assessment of undernutrition and frailty in these children,[ 3 18 ] it is a surrogate parameter that reflects subcutaneous fat tissue, bone, and muscle and may not be an ideal tool to specifically detect MW. The role of MAMA in determining MW or PEW has not been studied in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAC and BMI, though cannot differentiate between fat and muscle mass, have been useful anthropometry parameters for PEW assessment in children with CKD. [ 3 15 16 17 ] Though MAC has been noted to be useful for assessment of undernutrition and frailty in these children,[ 3 18 ] it is a surrogate parameter that reflects subcutaneous fat tissue, bone, and muscle and may not be an ideal tool to specifically detect MW. The role of MAMA in determining MW or PEW has not been studied in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think it important to overcome these barriers and obtain all necessary anthropometric measurements. For example, severe acute malnutrition includes in its definition a MUAC less than or equal to 115 mm (20); in the NutriPIC study, of 15 patients less than 24 months old who had a MUAC z score of less than -2, there were 7 with measurement less than or equal to 115 mm. In Guinea-Bissau (1995 vs 2006), MUAC appeared to be associated with nutritional changes in muscle and fat mass, rather than BMI (21).…”
Section: At the Bedsidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the anthropometric z-scores used in diagnosis and classification of malnutrition, specifically BMI, WFL and MUAC z-scores, are not exactly concordant, the thresholds proposed for classification are identical (62). Indeed, the sensitivity of proposed MUAC z-score thresholds was reported to systematically decrease with increasing severity of malnutrition, emphasizing the need for optimization to decrease the risk of misclassification and for further complementary data from longitudinal studies (62). Accordingly, while the MUAC z-score tape seems to meet the criteria of a desirable (i.e., inexpensive, noninvasive, easy to implement) pediatric malnutrition screening tool (20,63), it has yet to be evaluated in larger populations by increasing the accessibility to device not only for community health workers and volunteers but also in the hospital setting (21, 32).…”
Section: Assessment Of Muac Z-score: Traditional Vs Z-score Tapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the anthropometric z -scores used in diagnosis and classification of malnutrition, specifically BMI, WFL and MUAC z -scores, are not exactly concordant, the thresholds proposed for classification are identical ( 62 ). Indeed, the sensitivity of proposed MUAC z -score thresholds was reported to systematically decrease with increasing severity of malnutrition, emphasizing the need for optimization to decrease the risk of misclassification and for further complementary data from longitudinal studies ( 62 ).…”
Section: Assessment Of Muac Z-score: Traditional Vs Z-score Tapementioning
confidence: 99%