2009
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining motivational interviewing from a client agency perspective

Abstract: Although empirical investigations strongly support the use of motivational interviewing (MI), there is no theory to clearly explain how or why MI works. The authors propose that MI is efficacious because it mobilizes clients' inherent resources for motivation, learning, creativity, problem solving, and goal-driven activity. Examining MI from a client agency perspective reveals new ways of conceptualizing several critical issues, including MI's fundamental "spirit," the function of resolving ambivalence, the im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the parents meet an empathic staff member able to engage in a constructive conversation, it seems that the parents discover new opportunities and resources to overcome obstacles in their lives by implementing changes. This finding is consistent with the analysis by Faris et al (2009) on MI from a client agency perspective. They define client agency as the individual capability of engaging in recovering or self-healing activities.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When the parents meet an empathic staff member able to engage in a constructive conversation, it seems that the parents discover new opportunities and resources to overcome obstacles in their lives by implementing changes. This finding is consistent with the analysis by Faris et al (2009) on MI from a client agency perspective. They define client agency as the individual capability of engaging in recovering or self-healing activities.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…That is, the therapist operating from this "client-asexpert" stance may promote greater client self-trust and selfreliance (Bohart & Tallman, 1997;Rogers, 1959); the advantages of which may be particularly evident after treatment ends and the client must cope independently of therapist guidance. In other words, the MI-CBT therapist's constant search for opportunities to find, call forth, and foster client agency (at all stages of change), together with the therapist's inherent belief in the client's capabilities, may lead clients to internalize a belief in, and an increasing reliance on, their own inner resources (Faris, Cavell, Fishburne, & Britton, 2009).…”
Section: Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI is a therapeutic approach designed to facilitate individuals' capacity to make adaptive health‐related choices and changes (Miller & Rollnick, 2012). Important to the effective use of MI is adherence to the fundamental tenet of respecting individuals' autonomy and sense of agency (Faris, Cavell, Fishburne, & Britton, 2009). Also potentially relevant is the transtheoretical model of change (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1994), which in the context of CG‐IM would recognize that parents likely vary in their readiness to reach out and seek the support of other adults in caring for their children.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%