2008
DOI: 10.1177/0011000007301669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Objectification Theory

Abstract: Many theorists have suggested that living in a culture in which women's bodies are sexually objectified socializes girls and women to treat themselves as objects. This study developed a theory-based measure of cultural sexual objectification and explored the relationship between women's reports of cultural sexual objectification experiences and self-objectification. The possible moderating effects of sexual orientation were explored using hierarchical moderated regressions. The major findings, in a sample of 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
58
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lesbian women did not report experiencing less sexual objectification than heterosexual women (consistent with findings of Hill and Fischer 2008), but did report less body surveillance, suggesting the possibility that something associated with lesbian identity may attenuate the effects of being objectified by others (or, alternatively, factors associated with heterosexual identity may increase the negative impact of the sexualized gaze on heterosexual women). This interpretation is consistent with findings that anticipating a male gaze (but not a female gaze) increased body shame in women (Calogero 2004).…”
Section: Tests Of Objectification Theorysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Lesbian women did not report experiencing less sexual objectification than heterosexual women (consistent with findings of Hill and Fischer 2008), but did report less body surveillance, suggesting the possibility that something associated with lesbian identity may attenuate the effects of being objectified by others (or, alternatively, factors associated with heterosexual identity may increase the negative impact of the sexualized gaze on heterosexual women). This interpretation is consistent with findings that anticipating a male gaze (but not a female gaze) increased body shame in women (Calogero 2004).…”
Section: Tests Of Objectification Theorysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…If participants rank the appearance-based attributes as more important than the competence-based attributes, a negative correlation would be expected between the two sets of attributes. Previous research using this method as a measure of internal consistency reliability for the SOQ has demonstrated strong negative correlations between appearance and competence rankings, indicating good reliability, r = −.81 to −.88 (Calogero & Jost, 2011;Hill & Fischer, 2008). For the current study, the correlations between appearance and competence rankings were −.99, −1.00, −1.00, and −1.00 for baseline, post-intervention, 5-month follow-up, and 1-year follow-up, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The scoring method for the SOQ and the nature of the rank-ordered data prevents traditional reporting of internal consistency values. Therefore, internal consistency reliability is determined by calculating a correlation between the sum of the appearance-based items and the sum of the competence-based items (Hill & Fischer, 2008). If participants rank the appearance-based attributes as more important than the competence-based attributes, a negative correlation would be expected between the two sets of attributes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, reading beauty magazines (Harper & Tiggemann, 2008;Morry & Staska, 2001), watching music videos or other sexually objectifying television (Aubrey, 2006a;Grabe & Hyde, 2009), exercising at a gym or fitness centre (Prichard & Tiggemann, 2005;Slater & Tiggemann, 2006), and being a member of a sorority (Basow, Foran, & Bookwala, 2007) have all shown some links with either self-objectification or self-surveillance. Sexual objectification experiences have been examined further by Kozee and colleagues including the development of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale (Kozee & Tylka, 2006;Kozee, Tylka, Augustus-Horvath, & Denchik, 2007) and the investigation of unwanted sexual advances or peer sexual harassment or teasing (Hill & Fischer, 2008;Lindberg et al, 2007;Petersen & Hyde, 2013). Importantly however, the majority of this work on the experiences of sexual objectification has been conducted using adult college-aged women (for a more thorough review see Moradi & Huang, 2008).…”
Section: Predictors Of Self-objectificationmentioning
confidence: 99%