Examining patterns in medication documentation of trade and generic names in an academic family practice training centre

Abstract

BackgroundStudies in the United States have shown that physicians commonly use brand names when documenting medications in an outpatient setting. However, the prevalence of prescribing and documenting brand name medication has not been assessed in a clinical teaching environment. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of generic versus brand names for a select number of pharmaceutical products in clinical documentation in a large, urban academic family practice centre.MethodsA retrospective chart review of the electronic medical records of the St. Michael’s Hospital Academic Family Health Team (SMHAFHT). Data for twenty commonly prescribed medications were collected from the Cumulative Patient Profile as of August 1, 2014. Each medication name was classified as generic or trade. Associations between documentation patterns and physician characteristics were assessed.ResultsAmong 9763 patients prescribed any of the twenty medications of interest, 45% of patient charts contained trade nomenclature exclusively. 32% of charts contained only generic nomenclature, and 23% contained a mix of generic and trade nomenclature. There was large variation in use of generic nomenclature amongst physicians, ranging from 19% to 93%.ConclusionsTrade names in clinical documentation, which likely reflect prescribing habits, continue to be used abundantly in the academic setting. This may become part of the informal curriculum, potentially facilitating undue bias in trainees. Further study is needed to determine characteristics which influence use of generic or trade nomenclature and the impact of this trend on trainees’ clinical knowledge and decision-making.

Out-of-pocket spending for oral contraceptives among women with private insurance coverage after the Affordable Care Act

“…A 2012 survey of prescribers found that the majority of prescribers rarely asked about a patient's prescription insurance coverage or consulted a drug list before writing a prescription [ 17 ]. Physicians' use and documentation of contraceptives' brand names rather than their generic names may also lead to promotion of brand-name contraceptive use when generic alternatives are available [ 18 , 19 ]. There may be information system technologies that could help providers access drug pricing information to help guide cost-conscious clinical decision making [ 20 ].…”

What do patients learn about psychotropic medications on the web? A natural language processing study

“…Existing literature on medication name usage in humanauthored text suggests that trade names are more commonly used than generic names. (Steinman et al, 2007;Summers et al, 2017) This raises the possibility that the trend toward generally more subjective (both greater negative and positive sentiment) trade name documents may be the result of individual authors' tendency to use the more memorable or evocative name, whereas less subjective standardized medication catalogs and treatment information sites may be more commonly captured in the generic name sample. More recent medications not yet available in generic form may also be referenced by marketing efforts, with greater positive sentiment on industry-supported web pages optimized to appear at the top of Internet searches.…”

Outpatient prescription audit in a tertiary care hospital at Puducherry

“…Lack of time in the crowded OPDs, and ease of documentation can also contribute to the latter fact. 27 Various national and international regulatory bodies recommend generic drug prescribing for the above mentioned reasons. 28 The percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drug list in our center was 87.9 %, (WHO standards 100%) which indicates fairly enough drugs were prescribed from the essential medicine list.…”