2010
DOI: 10.1097/iyc.0b013e3181e1a211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Risk and Protective Factors in Head Start Populations Located in High- and Low-Violence Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to directly relating to positive child outcomes, prosocial behaviors may mitigate (i.e., moderate) the negative effects of environmental adversity. It has been hypothesized that when children help others, they foster positive relationships and emotions that can buffer them from the negative effects of contextual stressors and resource limitations (Eisenberg et al, 2016), such as those encountered in low SES neighborhoods (Fedor, Bender, & Carlson, 2010). For example, children ages 3‐to‐7 from poorer neighborhoods and schools who also demonstrated more prosocial behaviors—as reported by parents—developed fewer emotional and behavioral problems compared to their less prosocial peers (Flouri & Sarmadi, 2016).…”
Section: Low Neighborhood Ses Is Associated With Children’s Developmental Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to directly relating to positive child outcomes, prosocial behaviors may mitigate (i.e., moderate) the negative effects of environmental adversity. It has been hypothesized that when children help others, they foster positive relationships and emotions that can buffer them from the negative effects of contextual stressors and resource limitations (Eisenberg et al, 2016), such as those encountered in low SES neighborhoods (Fedor, Bender, & Carlson, 2010). For example, children ages 3‐to‐7 from poorer neighborhoods and schools who also demonstrated more prosocial behaviors—as reported by parents—developed fewer emotional and behavioral problems compared to their less prosocial peers (Flouri & Sarmadi, 2016).…”
Section: Low Neighborhood Ses Is Associated With Children’s Developmental Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to directly relating to positive child outcomes, prosocial behaviors may mitigate (i.e., moderate) the negative effects of environmental adversity. It has been hypothesized that when children help others, they foster positive relationships and emotions that can buffer them from the negative effects of contextual stressors and resource limitations (Eisenberg et al, 2016), such as those encountered in low SES neighborhoods (Fedor, Bender, & Carlson, 2010). For example, children ages 3-to-7 from poorer neighborhoods and schools who also demonstrated more prosocial behaviors-as reported by parents-developed fewer emotional and behavioral problems compared to their less prosocial peers (Flouri & Sarmadi, 2016).…”
Section: Prosocial Behavior May Mitigate Effects Of Neighborhood Adve...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural consequence of all this is the general decrease of the offered level of childcare and more specifically of the school regulations (Kohen, Leventhal, Dahinten & McIntosh, 2008). In addition, one more study (Fedor et al, 2010) found that the behavioral problems of young children were more trivial in neighborhoods with less violence incidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%