2001
DOI: 10.1108/13620430110381025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining sources of influence on employee turnover in the part‐time work context

Abstract: Extensive research has examined sources of influence on employee turnover in the full-time work context. Far less research attention has been given to addressing sources of influence on turnover in the part-time work scenario. The aim of this study was to examine sources of influence on turnover among part-time employees. Survey data were collected from 412 part-time employees in the military reserves. The results of this study draw attention to a number of important sources of influence on turnover among part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Barak et al (2001), job satisfaction has been found as the key reason due to which employees leave their jobs. There is a significant negative association between turnover intention and job satisfaction (Chan and Morrison, 2000;Ghiselli et al, 2001;McBey and Karakowsky, 2001). In contrast of the other employment opportunities available, job satisfaction is the good predictor of turnover intention (Purani & Sahadev, 2007;Shields Ward, 2001).…”
Section: Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Barak et al (2001), job satisfaction has been found as the key reason due to which employees leave their jobs. There is a significant negative association between turnover intention and job satisfaction (Chan and Morrison, 2000;Ghiselli et al, 2001;McBey and Karakowsky, 2001). In contrast of the other employment opportunities available, job satisfaction is the good predictor of turnover intention (Purani & Sahadev, 2007;Shields Ward, 2001).…”
Section: Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research results prove that turnover intention is affected by the job stress. Job satisfaction and commitment with organization decreases due to the increase in stress .And if organizational commitment and job satisfaction is low then it will increase the propensity to leave (Hellman, 1997;McBey and Karakowsky, 2001;Ghiselli et al, 2001). Moore, (2002) stated that a factor greatly effects people's intention to leave their jobs which is job satisfaction.…”
Section: Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An opportunity for promotion and career development elsewhere also encourages staff to leave their current employment (Iverson and Deery, 2007). According to McBey and Karakowsky (2001), research has largely supported the argument that education is positively related to employee turn-over. It is not unexpected that, in this knowledge-based era, skill and academic upgrades promise an individual a competitive advantage and provide opportunities for promotion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…directly relate to the workers and are thus important for preventing industrial accidents. There are also external safety factors unique to the modern society's workplace, such as sleep disturbances due to shift work or night shifts, that result from the increasing number of shift workers in an unstable work environment and in work environments that are characteristic of firms are in today's workplace (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). If these harmful conditions persist at the working environment, Korean society may sustain a loss of workers and corporations, which may further adversely affect its socioeconomic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%