Developing space systems often comes with high costs and long development times, resulting in significant investment. Space systems can take large amounts of resources to design, build, test, field, and operate, and can be required to operate for long periods of time in very harsh environments.These environments may be dynamic and possibly unanticipated during design and development. Given the large investment, space systems are expected to succeed in spite of encountering perturbations (disturbances or epoch shifts) that could impact their value delivery. The concept of value sustainment is proposed as the ability to maintain value delivery in the presence of such perturbations. Of the two types of perturbations, responses to epoch shifts (i.e. shift in context and/or needs) are investigated in this paper. The construct of Epoch Shift-Impact-Response-Outcome is proposed as a way to characterize and analyze historical system responses to changing operating contexts and needs. Four different historical cases, Iridium, Globalstar, Teledesic, and Galileo, and associated epoch shifts, are described, providing insights into how systems can respond to perturbations and what system characteristics aid in that process. The concept of ilities is briefly introduced, linking the system response to qualities that make a system successful. The epoch shift case studies, along with the corresponding displayed ilities in these systems, may provide a useful framework for future study. A broad survey of past systems characterized in this way may provide insights into the types of dynamic uncertainties that pose risks to such systems, as well as patterns of response (i.e. ilities) for such systems, in order to enhance the ability to intentionally design for value sustainment across dynamic operating environments in the future.