2011
DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2011.tb01313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Survivability of Systems of Systems

Abstract: Abstract. Previous research has identified design principles that enable survivability for systems, but it is unclear if these principles are appropriate and sufficient for systems of systems as well.This paper presents a preliminary examination of how some of the characteristic properties of systems of systems may enable or hinder survivability, based on existing design principles and a newly proposed taxonomy of disturbances. Two new design principles, defensive posture and adaptation, are introduced. The ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All systems aim to provide some level of value to stakeholders occupying or utilizing a system throughout its life cycle, changeability as a concept aims to extend the value of the system by enabling and supporting changes to take place (Mekdeci 2013). As a high-level system ility changeability can be broadly understood as the ability of a system to change form, function, or operation, according to lower-level system ilities such as flexibility, agility, adaptability, evolvability, upgradeability, and versatility.…”
Section: Changeability Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All systems aim to provide some level of value to stakeholders occupying or utilizing a system throughout its life cycle, changeability as a concept aims to extend the value of the system by enabling and supporting changes to take place (Mekdeci 2013). As a high-level system ility changeability can be broadly understood as the ability of a system to change form, function, or operation, according to lower-level system ilities such as flexibility, agility, adaptability, evolvability, upgradeability, and versatility.…”
Section: Changeability Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variety of Environments: may be indicated by the number of embedded systems, integration of diverse technologies, or number of operational contexts (Mekdeci, 2013). Interrelated elements and embedded system can be impacted by all changes placed upon the system and are affected by the evolution of technology (Ross and Rhodes, 2008a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial attempts at classification yielded categories such as "origin" (whether the perturbation started externally or internally) and "intent" (whether the perturbation was caused intentionally by an intelligent entity, or not) [8]. These types of classifications are very useful if the system architects want to target specific types of perturbations and ignore others.…”
Section: Determing a Suitable Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbances can be defined as unintended, finite duration changes of a system's form, operations, or context that could jeopardize value delivery 5 . Survivability (in "value"), then, is the ability of a system to minimize the impact of a (finite duration) disturbance on value delivery 6,7 . Figure 2 shows three types of survivability; susceptibility reduction (Type I), vulnerability reduction (Type II), and resilience enhancement (Type III).…”
Section: Survivability As a Means To Withstand Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%