2020
DOI: 10.1080/1046560x.2019.1709726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining teachers’ classroom strategies to understand their goals for student learning around the science practices in the Next Generation Science Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
17
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When the goal was to engage students, the same teacher used open-ended and inquiry-based labs. A more recent study by Kawasaki and Sandoval (2020) investigated the multiple goals of science teachers related to the NGSS. They found that the goals teachers held were often misaligned with the NGSS, leading to teaching practices that did not support students achieving the outcomes detailed in the NGSS.…”
Section: Contextual Influences On Science Teachers Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the goal was to engage students, the same teacher used open-ended and inquiry-based labs. A more recent study by Kawasaki and Sandoval (2020) investigated the multiple goals of science teachers related to the NGSS. They found that the goals teachers held were often misaligned with the NGSS, leading to teaching practices that did not support students achieving the outcomes detailed in the NGSS.…”
Section: Contextual Influences On Science Teachers Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, adoption of new goals does not always lead to disengagement from older goals. Instead, previously adopted goals often remain influential in how people carry out their work-related tasks on a day-to-day basis (Allison & Zelikow, 1999;Kawasaki & Sandoval, 2020;March & Simon, 1993). This increases the likelihood of goal conflict, as the new goals compete with older goals for limited attention and resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When NGSS was released in 2013, the conceptualizations of science practices required teachers to change how they organized instruction, necessitating a significant shift in the way science is taught (Kawasaki & Sandoval, 2020). The intention was to transition students away from merely learning about science ideas to figuring out science ideas (Cherbow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Science Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that autonomysupportive instruction brings about high intrinsic motivation in students and leads to persistence with learning tasks (Baker & Goodboy, 2018). In regards to the science practices, autonomy-supportive instruction gives students agency, allowing them to be responsible for their own epistemic production and dialogue with others regarding their scientific knowledge-building process (Kawasaki & Sandoval, 2020). Educators with an autonomy-supportive instruction style take a neutral stance towards student initiative rather than being strongly prescriptive about what students should think or feel (Reeve et al, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning of specific science concepts becomes meaningful and interesting to learners if it explains their life experiences (Kawasaki & Sandoval, 2020). A http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter deliberate use of scientific issues (socio-scientific issues) that require learners to engage in dialogue, discussion, and debate (Zeidler & Nichols, 2009) enables learners to engage with and understand abstract concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%