“…, 2021 ( 43 ) A population-based prospective cohort study in the Netherlands (NEMESIS-2) | ES-SCZ showed a significantly better discriminative function (AUC = 0.84; LR − = 0.20; LR + = 3.86) than Emet and Esum ES-SCZ was associated with SCZ diagnosis with the highest OR (2.76 [95% CI = 2.20 – 3.46]) and the greatest explained variance ( R 2 = 14.03%) among 33 mental and physical health outcomes | Erzin et al. , 2021a ( 48 ) | Multinational study of individuals with SCZ, unaffected siblings, and control subjects (EUGEI and GROUP) | ES-SCZ was associated with poor global functioning domains in control subjects, siblings, and patients in EUGEI, also after controlling for PRS-SCZ Results were replicated independently in GROUP |
Erzin et al. , 2021b ( 47 ) | One-year follow-up study of individuals with FEP in Greece (Athens FEP Research Study) | ES-SCZ was associated with poor global and specific functioning domains at baseline and 1 month, also after controlling for demographic, familial, and other environmental factors and clinical features ES-SCZ predicted poor improvement in symptom severity (particularly negative symptoms) from baseline to 1 month assessment |
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; Emet, aggregate environmental score weighted by the meta-analytic estimates; Esum, environmental sum score; ES-SCZ, exposome score for schizophrenia; EUGEI, European Network of National Networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia; FEP, first-episode psychosis; GROUP, Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis Study; LR, likelihood ratio; NEMESIS-2, Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2; OR, odds ratio; PRS-SCZ, polygenic risk score for schizophrenia; SCZ, schizophrenia.…”