2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the biological mechanisms of human mental disorders resulting from gene-environment interdependence using novel functional genomic approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed we found significant main effects of the PRSs of Major depressive disorder 60 and Type 2 diabetes 59 on comorbidity in UK Biobank. Overall, these results align with the well-known capacity of PRS to detect main genetic effects, as well as demonstrate the ability of our ePGS technique in identifying responsivity to environmental change as compared to traditional GWASbased PRS 76 . PRS main effects were not observed in adolescents from ALSPAC probably due to the specificity of the GWAS to the features of the original discovery sample; the majority of GWASs are generated based on adult samples 77 , thus limiting the extrapolation of the effects in different ages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed we found significant main effects of the PRSs of Major depressive disorder 60 and Type 2 diabetes 59 on comorbidity in UK Biobank. Overall, these results align with the well-known capacity of PRS to detect main genetic effects, as well as demonstrate the ability of our ePGS technique in identifying responsivity to environmental change as compared to traditional GWASbased PRS 76 . PRS main effects were not observed in adolescents from ALSPAC probably due to the specificity of the GWAS to the features of the original discovery sample; the majority of GWASs are generated based on adult samples 77 , thus limiting the extrapolation of the effects in different ages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The ePRS-IR aggregates information on the relationship between the gene of interest and other genes in the genome, the levels of tissue-specific gene expression, the genetic variation of the target sample (given by the genotyping data) and the tissue-specific effect size of the association between genotyping and gene expression (given by GTeX). Therefore, variations in the ePRS-IR represent individual variations in the expression of the tissuespecific gene co-expression network [18]. In the case of our study, variations in the ePRS-IR represent individual variations in the expression of the insulin receptor gene network in the mesocorticolimbic area or in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This difference would be expected if SNP’s comprising an ePGS are context dependent. This may explain why the ePGS may be more suited to identify GxE interaction effects 40 as documented below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%