2022
DOI: 10.1177/10731911221113563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Concurrent and Predictive Validity of Single Items in Ecological Momentary Assessments

Abstract: Although single items can save time and burden in psychology research, concerns about their reliability have made the use of multiple-item measures the default standard practice. Although single items cannot demonstrate internal reliability, their criterion validity can be compared with multiple-item measures. Using ecological momentary assessment data, we evaluated repeated measures correlations and constructed multilevel cross-lagged models to assess concurrent and predictive validity of single- and multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, research has shown that single-item measures can have good predictive validity and reduce participant burden by keeping surveys brief (Song et al, 2022), and the excellent psychometric qualities of the ESM items used in this study were reported elsewhere (Hoebeke et al, 2022). Future studies could also include brief computerized tasks measuring attention control, though administrating reliable computerized tasks assessing AC four times a day may discourage participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Moreover, research has shown that single-item measures can have good predictive validity and reduce participant burden by keeping surveys brief (Song et al, 2022), and the excellent psychometric qualities of the ESM items used in this study were reported elsewhere (Hoebeke et al, 2022). Future studies could also include brief computerized tasks measuring attention control, though administrating reliable computerized tasks assessing AC four times a day may discourage participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Consequently, replication of study results utilizing a more comprehensive measure of interpersonal stress is needed to generalize findings. Single item measures have demonstrated significant predictive validity compared with multiple item measures in EMA studies (Song et al, 2022), however, exclusive use of single items in the present study precludes more rigorous psychometric investigation. Finally, this study did not assess contextual factors such as the type of relationship and person associated with endorsed interpersonal stress (e.g., colleague, romantic partner) which may differentially impact the relationship between interpersonal factors and risk for NSSI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We assessed desire using one to three items that were designed to assess a brief snapshot of a person’s current level of desire. The items tended to be highly correlated (Studies 1 and 3), and single-item measures demonstrate appropriate predictive validity in experience sampling studies (Song et al, 2022 ). Further, our findings are largely consistent with previous work conceptualizing desire in response to sexual stimuli, whereby patterns of desire change are similar for women and men (Dawson et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%