Examining the Effects of Controlling for Shared Variance among the Dark Triad Using Meta–Analytic Structural Equation Modelling

Abstract

Multivariate procedures (e.g. structural equation modelling) are essential to personality psychology, but interpretive difficulties can arise when examining the relations between residualized variables (i.e. the residual content of a variable after its overlap with other variables has been statistically controlled for) and outcomes of interest. These issues have been the focus of recent debate within the research literature on the Dark Triad, which is a collection of interrelated but theoretically distinct personality constructs made up of narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. The present paper highlights previous work on the issue of partialling and also makes use of recent developments surrounding meta‐analytic structural equation modelling to reliably assess the impact of partialling on the empirical profiles of the Dark Triad components. The results show that numerous interpretive difficulties arise after partialling the overlap among the Dark Triad components, most notably for narcissism and Machiavellianism. The results are discussed in the context of contemporary Dark Triad research in addition to discussing the implications for structural equation modelling methods in personality psychology more generally. Recommendations are made for how future research can mitigate the interpretive difficulties that may arise from partialling. Copyright © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology

Will they stay or will they go? Narcissistic admiration and rivalry predict ingroup affiliation and devaluation

“…We identify differential effects of narcissistic admiration and rivalry, related to self-enhancement and self-protection, on ingroup affiliation and devaluation. Although admiration and rivalry are modestly correlated in the current sample (r = 0.28), it is notable that the pattern of results is quite similar when controlling for the other dimensions of narcissism (i.e., residual relations; Vize, Collison, Miller, & Lynam, 2018) and with only the focal predictor in the model. An exception is that the positive association between admiration and social identity was somewhat stronger when including narcissistic rivalry in the model.…”

A Comprehensive Examination of Narcissists’ Self-Perceived and Actual Socioemotional Cognition Ability

“…When integrating Study 1 and Study 2 data, however, the negative associations to both narcissism facets emerged again, both in the 1-facet-model and in the 2-facet-model. This pattern of results highlights that controlled effects should be interpreted with caution (e.g., Vize et al, 2018) especially with small to medium sample sizes. Instead, these samples should be integrated by means of mega-or meta-analytical techniques to render the estimation as accurate as possible.…”

“…These associations differed significantly from those found for Study 1 both for agentic narcissism and for antagonistic narcissism in the 2-facet model. This finding underlines the often less robust nature of associations that are controlled for overlapping constructs (see, e.g., Vize, Collison, Miller, & Lynam, 2018). To provide results that are even more robust, we further analyzed the data of both studies by means of a mega-analytic integration.…”

The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives

“…DeMars, 2013; Murray et al, 2015). Rather, to account for the DoPL scales' shared variance, we recommend conducting linear multiple regressions with all DoPL scales in the same model to obtain residualised/unique effects (Vize, Collison, Miller, & Lynam, 2018) and, for comparison, report correlations of the individual DoPL scales with the external variable.…”