2020
DOI: 10.1086/710041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Efficacy of a Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention by Group Size and Initial Skill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 A post-hoc analysis revealed an aptitude-by-treatment interaction in which children with better math skills at screening showed a larger immediate effect regarding performance on number-line estimation (b = -.13, p , .001). This is in line with other studies that have found that initial math skills level may moderate the effectiveness of math interventions (Clarke et al, 2020). In this sense, our findings are consistent with other studies that have found that numeric training may benefit children at risk of MLD to a larger extent (e.g., Nemmi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 A post-hoc analysis revealed an aptitude-by-treatment interaction in which children with better math skills at screening showed a larger immediate effect regarding performance on number-line estimation (b = -.13, p , .001). This is in line with other studies that have found that initial math skills level may moderate the effectiveness of math interventions (Clarke et al, 2020). In this sense, our findings are consistent with other studies that have found that numeric training may benefit children at risk of MLD to a larger extent (e.g., Nemmi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3A post-hoc analysis revealed an aptitude-by-treatment interaction in which children with better math skills at screening showed a larger immediate effect regarding performance on number-line estimation ( b = –.13, p < .001). This is in line with other studies that have found that initial math skills level may moderate the effectiveness of math interventions (Clarke et al, 2020). …”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The difference in initial skill between the samples is further demonstrated by mean standard scores and percentile rank at pretest, with a mean score of 68.9 (percentile rank of 4.6) on the TEMA in the initial Oregon sample compared with a mean TEMA score of 80.2 in Texas (percentile rank of 19.1). Importantly, multiple studies have found that initial math skill moderates response to the ROOTS intervention, with students with lower initial skills benefiting more from the intervention than at-risk peers with higher initial skills (Clarke et al, 2019, 2020). This finding has been replicated in Massachusetts and Oregon with multiple cohorts of students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the null findings here suggest that in a lower-risk sample, when strong core instructional practices are in place, implementing an intensive Tier 2 intervention, such as ROOTS, may not be the best course of action to meet the learning needs of at-risk students. Although it is designed as a Tier 2 intervention, converging evidence suggests that the ROOTS program best meets the educational needs of students with significant skill deficits in mathematics (Clarke et al, 2019, 2020). We interpret the present results as further indicating that the learning needs of at-risk kindergarten students with higher initial math skills may be adequately met when core instructional time is devoted to evidence-based instructional supports that facilitate understanding of core content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation