2021
DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-06-2021-2811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the gendered organizations: evidence of institutional discrimination

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how a group of special companies, i.e. highly acknowledged and awarded ones operating in Brazil handle the gender issue. Design/methodology/approach This investigation relies on historical analysis by addressing essentially a surface-level indicator (i.e. gender preferences). Rather, this study is grounded on data from the companies that were awarded as one of the best organizations to work for in Brazil by Época-Great Place to Work® Institute and Guia Você S/A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on research that demonstrates how “gendered organizations” might favor one gender over another either intentionally or unintentionally (e.g. Vasconcelos, 2021), future research can determine whether the similarity-attraction effect is more pronounced in facilitating authentic interactions across nurses with the potential for more female–female interactions. Indeed, female–female interactions exhibit a “stronger similarity effect” compared to male–male interactions (Montoya and Horton, 2013, p. 75).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on research that demonstrates how “gendered organizations” might favor one gender over another either intentionally or unintentionally (e.g. Vasconcelos, 2021), future research can determine whether the similarity-attraction effect is more pronounced in facilitating authentic interactions across nurses with the potential for more female–female interactions. Indeed, female–female interactions exhibit a “stronger similarity effect” compared to male–male interactions (Montoya and Horton, 2013, p. 75).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%