2010
DOI: 10.1080/08957341003673815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Impact of Audio Presentation on Tests of Reading Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of correlations of the TLC-n and TLC-e forms with listening comprehension ratings were slightly lower than the correlations with reading comprehension ratings. It is possible that teachers based their evaluation of listening comprehension on similar paper-and-pencil reading tests (Laitusis, 2012). Listening comprehension and vocabulary correlations were low, ranging from 0.26 to 0.44.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of correlations of the TLC-n and TLC-e forms with listening comprehension ratings were slightly lower than the correlations with reading comprehension ratings. It is possible that teachers based their evaluation of listening comprehension on similar paper-and-pencil reading tests (Laitusis, 2012). Listening comprehension and vocabulary correlations were low, ranging from 0.26 to 0.44.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Meloy et al () and McKevitt and Elliott () found similar gains for students with and without disabilities as a result of receiving read‐aloud accommodations on reading tests. Crawford and Tindal () and Laitusis (), however, found a differential boost from the read‐aloud accommodation compared to the nonaccommodation condition for students with disabilities relative to students without disabilities. In summary, studies on the use of read‐aloud accommodations in reading tests present mixed findings, and whether we should provide read‐aloud accommodations in reading tests continues to be a controversial issue (Thurlow et al., ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Using video games and multimedia as tools for teaching writing (Gerber & Price, 2011;Heaven, 2014;Proske, Roscoe & McNamara, 2014), • Using multisensory stimuli to enhance the quality of reading comprehension (Baines, 2008(Baines, , 2013Dymock & Nicholson, 2010;Laitusis, 2010), • Using multimedia to teach listening and speaking skills (Fisher & Frey, 2014;Nguyet & Mai, 2012;Skouge, Rao & Boisvert, 2007).…”
Section: New Toolsmentioning
confidence: 98%