Examining the Impact of Knowledge Mobilization Strategies to Inform Urban Stakeholders on Accessibility: A Mixed-Methods study

Labbé, Delphine; Mahmood, Atiya; Miller, William C.

doi:10.3390/ijerph17051561

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2022[ 65 ] Labbé et al. 2020 [ 66 ] Knowledge-to-action (KTA) framework (Graham et al., 2006) Straus et al. 2010 [ 67 ] Graham et al.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies

Ziam,

Lanoue,

McSween-Cadieux

et al. 2024

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Evaluating knowledge mobilization strategies (KMb) presents challenges for organizations seeking to understand their impact to improve KMb effectiveness. Moreover, the large number of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) available can be confusing for users. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to identify and describe the characteristics of TMFs that have been used or proposed in the literature to evaluate KMb strategies. Methods A scoping review methodology was used. Articles were identified through searches in electronic databases, previous reviews and reference lists of included articles. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened in duplicate. Data were charted using a piloted data charting form. Data extracted included study characteristics, KMb characteristics, and TMFs used or proposed for KMb evaluation. An adapted version of Nilsen (Implement Sci 10:53, 2015) taxonomy and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy (Powell et al. in Implement Sci 10:21, 2015) guided data synthesis. Results Of the 4763 search results, 505 were retrieved, and 88 articles were eligible for review. These consisted of 40 theoretical articles (45.5%), 44 empirical studies (50.0%) and four protocols (4.5%). The majority were published after 2010 (n = 70, 79.5%) and were health related (n = 71, 80.7%). Half of the studied KMb strategies were implemented in only four countries: Canada, Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom (n = 42, 47.7%). One-third used existing TMFs (n = 28, 31.8%). According to the adapted Nilsen taxonomy, process models (n = 34, 38.6%) and evaluation frameworks (n = 28, 31.8%) were the two most frequent types of TMFs used or proposed to evaluate KMb. According to the ERIC taxonomy, activities to “train and educate stakeholders” (n = 46, 52.3%) were the most common, followed by activities to “develop stakeholder interrelationships” (n = 23, 26.1%). Analysis of the TMFs identified revealed relevant factors of interest for the evaluation of KMb strategies, classified into four dimensions: context, process, effects and impacts. Conclusions This scoping review provides an overview of the many KMb TMFs used or proposed. The results provide insight into potential dimensions and components to be considered when assessing KMb strategies.

show abstract

“…2022[ 65 ] Labbé et al. 2020 [ 66 ] Knowledge-to-action (KTA) framework (Graham et al., 2006) Straus et al. 2010 [ 67 ] Graham et al.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies

Ziam,

Lanoue,

McSween-Cadieux

et al. 2024

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Vancouver, the photo exhibit was displayed at several community outreach events held at university settings and cities’ facilities in fall 2018 to spring 2019, along with other knowledge transfer activities (see Labbé, Mahmood, Miller, Prescott, & Mortenson, 2020). In Quebec City, a special online edition of a sociology journal, Photo société, was launched at an event in spring 2019, and then was available online (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8KaBLZ5sNc).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using photovoice to increase social inclusion of people with disabilities: Reflections on the benefits and challenges

Labbé

Mahmood

Routhier

et al. 2020

Journal Community Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to understand the mobility experiences of mobility device users regarding the environmental and social barriers and facilitators in their community and to discuss the benefits and challenges of using photovoice, as a participatory methodology, to increase social participation for people with disabilities. Photovoice was used with mobility device users (n = 70) in two different locations in Canada. The participants took pictures for 2 weeks and then participated in individual interviews and focus group sessions to discuss their photographs. The participants took over 1,000 pictures that were grouped into five themes around social participation and accessibility. They chose the most illustrative pictures to share in an exhibit to create a dialogue with different stakeholders. Using photovoice offered many benefits such as allowing the participants to be equal partners of the research and made their voices heard in their community, but also presented disability-and study-related challenges.

show abstract

“…Methodical assessment of the impact of KMb activity is scarce,37 38 despite allied literature pointing to the need to build understanding39 and competence40 in this arena. Alternative approaches to evaluating KMb are available, for example, The Community Knowledge Mobilisation Framework41, however, this is more limited than the SIF particularly in terms of considering breadth and mechanisms of change.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can co-created knowledge mobilisation interventions alter and enhance mindlines to improve childhood eczema care? A UK-based Social Impact Framework evaluation

Cowdell¹,

Onselen²,

Pendleton³

2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of using knowledge mobilisation interventions to alter and enhance mindlines and improve childhood eczema care.DesignThe eczema mindlines study involved three stages: (1) mapping and confirming eczema mindlines, (2) intervention development and delivery and (3) analysis of intervention impact. The focus of this paper is on stage 3. Data analysis was guided by the Social Impact Framework to address the questions: (1) what is the impact of this study on individuals and groups? (2) what changes in behaviour and practice have occurred due to their involvement? (3) what mechanisms have enabled these impacts or changes to occur? and (4) what are the recommendations and questions arising from this research?SettingsA deprived inner-city neighbourhood in central England and national/international settings.ParticipantsPatients, practitioners and wider community members exposed to the interventions locally, nationally and internationally.ResultsData revealed tangible multi-level, relational and intellectual impacts. Mechanisms supporting impact included: simplicity and consistency of messages adapted to audience, flexibility, opportunism and perseverance, personal interconnectivity and acknowledgement of emotion. Co-created knowledge mobilisation strategies to alter and enhance mindlines mediated through knowledge brokering were effective in producing tangible changes in eczema care practice and self-management and in ‘mainstreaming’ childhood eczema in positive way across communities. These changes cannot be directly attributed to the knowledge mobilisation interventions, however, the evidence points to the significant contribution made.ConclusionCo-created knowledge mobilisation interventions offer a valuable method of altering and enhancing eczema mindlines across lay-practitioner-wider society boundaries. The Social Impact Framework provides comprehensive method of understanding and documenting the complex web of impact occurring as a result of knowledge mobilisation. This approach is transferable to managing other long-term conditions.

show abstract

Examining the Impact of Knowledge Mobilization Strategies to Inform Urban Stakeholders on Accessibility: A Mixed-Methods study

Cited by 19 publications

References 45 publications

A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies

A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies

Using photovoice to increase social inclusion of people with disabilities: Reflections on the benefits and challenges

Can co-created knowledge mobilisation interventions alter and enhance mindlines to improve childhood eczema care? A UK-based Social Impact Framework evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About