2011
DOI: 10.1080/13603110903265032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the implementation of two co‐teaching models: team teaching and station teaching

Abstract: In Turkey, the number of students in mainstream education is increasing, and a support service does not exist even though mainstreaming has been implemented for many years. Therefore, within this system, many students with special needs are failing. Thus, there is a need for evidence-based research projects concerning the ways of supporting these students such as the co-teaching approach. In the research detailed in this article, the participants were one regular education teacher and the researcher as special… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientists slightly differ in their explanation and definition of team-teaching. As Gurgur and Uzuner (2011) have noticed, team-teaching is one of branches of co-teaching. The researchers indicate that co-teaching takes place when two educators teach two separate subgroups of learners; however, they plan the learning process together and pursue common learning goals.…”
Section: The Definition Of Teamteachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists slightly differ in their explanation and definition of team-teaching. As Gurgur and Uzuner (2011) have noticed, team-teaching is one of branches of co-teaching. The researchers indicate that co-teaching takes place when two educators teach two separate subgroups of learners; however, they plan the learning process together and pursue common learning goals.…”
Section: The Definition Of Teamteachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this model provides both schools and universities possibilities for professional development of their teachers, education researchers or university lecturers in order to bridge the gap between theory and practice (Kansanen, Tirri, Meri, Krokfors, Husu & Jyrhämä, 2000;Korthagen, 2001). Third, Innovation Schools are expected to adopt team teaching approaches (David, 1995;Gurgur & Uzuner, 2011) in guiding student teachers' professional development. Fourth, these schools are for universities as a field of studies of innovative materials and methods and provide opportunities for schools to conduct action-research (Megowan-Romanowicz, 2010) at a new level of quality in cooperation with universities or other schools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is significant because increased amounts of training have been associated with higher self-efficacy and positive attitudes toward co-teaching (Pancsofar & Petroff, 2013). In addition, there is some evidence that even when co-planning time is provided, teachers may not have the knowledge to use it effectively, making the institution of this support without corresponding training potentially ineffective (Austin, 2001;Bryant Davis, Dieker, Pearl, & Kirkpatrick, 2012;Gürgür & Uzuner, 2011).…”
Section: School-level Structural Supports For Co-teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some indication that even when teachers have the time to co-plan, they either do not use it or do not have the skills to do it effectively (Austin, 2001;Bryant Davis et al, 2012;Gürgür & Uzuner, 2011), making the value of providing co-planning time questionable unless related training is provided as well. Unfortunately, staff development is often not seen as an essential component of implementing a co-teaching initiative.…”
Section: Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation