2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the influence of urban definition when assessing relative safety of drinking-water in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under current definitions, rural/urban boundaries are often arbitrary, and peri-urban areas can be difficult to classify. Such definitions have the potential to significantly impact reported differences in coverage rates when stratified by this variable [92]. Furthermore, intra-urban disparities are rarely captured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under current definitions, rural/urban boundaries are often arbitrary, and peri-urban areas can be difficult to classify. Such definitions have the potential to significantly impact reported differences in coverage rates when stratified by this variable [92]. Furthermore, intra-urban disparities are rarely captured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies used binary categorization of water sources as on-or off-plot and included surface water and unimproved sources in the referent off-plot group, which aggregates improved and unimproved source types that can vary in contamination (Bain et al, 2012) and accessibility. However, leaking pipes and intermittent service can compromise the quality of piped water (Kumpel and Nelson, 2014), and fecal contamination of piped water is frequent in low-and middle-income countries, particularly in rural areas (Bain et al, 2014a;Christenson et al, 2014). Additionally, several included studies reported that water obtained on plot was stored in containers and subsequently contaminated; this was reported in a recent study in Cambodia, which also found that water collected on-plot was frequently stored in the same container with water from unimproved sources (Shaheed et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the water did not show Giardia sp cysts, the presence of total coliforms and E . coli index above those allowed by CONAMA [22] indicate contamination of the drinking water with faecal material [39]. Karon et al (2011) [19] also associated cases of giardiasis with the use of water with the number of total coliforms and turbidity levels above the limit, but without Giardia cysts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%