Examining the mediating role of innovativeness in the link between core competencies and SME performance

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of core competencies, namely, transformational leadership (TFL), entrepreneurial competence and technical competence on financial performance through the mediation effect of innovativeness, among owner-managed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries. Design/methodology/approach A research model was developed to test nine research hypotheses. Self-report questionnaires designed for this study were sent to SME owner-managers in Malaysia. A total of 178 completed questionnaires were successfully collected. SPSS and SmartPLS were used to perform the data analysis to test the measurement model and structural model. Findings This paper provides empirical evidence that behavioural innovativeness mediates the relationship between TFL and financial performance, product innovativeness mediates the relationships among entrepreneurial competence, technical competence and financial performance and process innovativeness mediates the relationship between technical competence and financial performance. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study are potentially limited by perceptual measures, cross-sectional data and the risk of response bias from a single informant. Practical implications Owner-managed SMEs can focus on developing the core competencies to achieve financial performance through innovative products, processes and behaviours. Policymakers and practitioners can gain fresh insights into the complexity of sustaining the business activities and financial performance of SMEs through the core competencies and innovativeness. Originality/value The extant literature has revealed that entrepreneurship, leadership, expertise and innovativeness are considered key factors in promoting financial performance, yet little is known about the combined effects of the core competencies on financial performance through innovativeness for owner-managed SMEs in the context of a developing country. The study makes an important contribution to filling this research gap.

Performance management of SMEs: a systematic literature review for antecedents and moderators

“…For example, Swoboda and Olejnik (2013) noted two distinct sets of antecedents of SMEs’ performance such as structural and strategy. Moreover, some valuable contributions have been made by the studies of Ng et al (2020), Singh et al (2020), de Zubielqui et al (2019) and Rhee et al (2010) which presented models that focused their attention only on innovation antecedents. Accordingly, Valdez-Juárez et al (2019) and Wang et al (2018) focus on knowledge – learning and human resource antecedents.…”

Innovation and small and medium enterprises’ performance in Cameroon

“…With the globalization of economies, the sphere of a firm's competitors is no longer limited to the local level and competition between firms is increasingly tough (Hitt et al , 2011). Faced with such a threat to companies, it is crucial that they develop strategies to be competitive and ensure their sustainability (Ng et al , 2019). With this in mind, there is an abundant literature in strategic management on approaches that a company can take to control competition (Hutzschenreuter and Gröne, 2009).…”

Competences for Strengthening Entrepreneurial Capabilities in Europe

“…Start-ups as a new form of SMEs that boost entrepreneurial potential usually represent an interdisciplinary team composition, hence researchers have spotted the positive influences of multiple cross-disciplinarity toward the development of entrepreneurial capital [49], which is a function of entrepreneurial competences and entrepreneurial commitment [50]. More recent studies reported the crucial role of transformational leadership, entrepreneurial competence, technical competence and innovativeness as core to owner-managed SMEs [51]. It is worth mentioning that researchers found coaching to be an instrument for entrepreneurs' support in leadership development and new idea implementation [52].…”