2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000242821.67001.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the production costs of antiretroviral drugs

Abstract: The availability of data on the cost of antiretroviral drug production and calculation of factory prices under a sustainable business model provide benchmarks that bulk purchasers of antiretroviral drugs could use to negotiate lower prices. While truly significant price decreases for antiretroviral drugs will depend largely on the future evolution of API prices, the present study demonstrates that for several antiretroviral drugs price reduction is currently possible. Whether or not these reductions materializ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the government gave the patent holder, Abbott, 10 days to offer a reasonable price, but in fact negotiations were protracted over 4 months, and concluded with the government agreeing on a price of US$1380 per patient per year for the old version and US$1518 for the heatstable version. The discounted price obtained was still far higher than the best prices available internationally by Abbott (US$500 per patient/year), and production cost estimates published by the WHO (US$338 per patient/ year) [37]. In addition, the Brazilian government made a number of concessions demanded by Abbott, including restricting the use of the compulsory licence, and a moratorium on future price negotiations until 2011 [38].…”
Section: Negotiation and Compromise In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the government gave the patent holder, Abbott, 10 days to offer a reasonable price, but in fact negotiations were protracted over 4 months, and concluded with the government agreeing on a price of US$1380 per patient per year for the old version and US$1518 for the heatstable version. The discounted price obtained was still far higher than the best prices available internationally by Abbott (US$500 per patient/year), and production cost estimates published by the WHO (US$338 per patient/ year) [37]. In addition, the Brazilian government made a number of concessions demanded by Abbott, including restricting the use of the compulsory licence, and a moratorium on future price negotiations until 2011 [38].…”
Section: Negotiation and Compromise In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbott responded by offering a price of US$2000 per patient per year (at the time a generic company was offering $1333 per patient/year). Given that the drug costs less than US$400 to manufacture [37] the MOPH proceeded with the compulsory licence. The company discounted the price again, to US$1000 per patient per year for both the old and the new version of the drug, and this offer was made available to 40 'middle-income' countries including Brazil.…”
Section: Challenging Patents In Thailandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deve-se considerar que, com a expansão do acesso ao tratamento contra HIV/AIDS nos países menos desenvolvidos, fruto da campanha internacional de acesso a anti-retrovirais, existe a possibilidade de escassez e, conseqüentemente, de encarecimento dos princípios ativos 65 . Mais preocupante ainda, a recente internalização da proteção patentária para o setor farmacêutico nas legislações de propriedade intelectual da China e da Índia implica, no médio prazo, sérias barreiras ao fornecimento de insumos para novos medicamentos.…”
Section: O Acesso Ao Tratamento Anti-retroviral No Brasil: Estratégiaunclassified
“…Tibotec is developing rilpivirine for the treatment of antiretroviralnaïve patients in combination with other antiretrovirals [15]. However, on the basis of its in vitro virological profile and specific pharmacokinetics it is reasonable to expect excellent safety and efficacy in treatment-experienced patients.…”
Section: Treatment Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%