Examining the Psychological Pathways to Behavior Change in a Group-Based Lifestyle Program to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes

Critchley, Christine; Hardie, Elizabeth A.; Moore, Susan

doi:10.2337/dc11-1183

Cited by 38 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Burke et al, 2007;Chariyeva et al, 2013;Ievers-Landis et al, 2003;Luszczynska, 2004;Morisky et al, 2001;Piaseu et al, 2002;Strathdee et al, 2009). Seven studies analysed for mediation effects of self-efficacy on health behaviour (V. Burke et al, 2007;Chariyeva et al, 2013;Critchley et al, 2012;Ievers-Landis et al, 2003;Luszczynska, 2004;Piaseu et al, 2002;Sharma et al, 2010) and of these six showed significant mediation effect between other psychological variables and health behaviour.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Critchley et al conducted a randomized control trial examining the psychological process of lifestyle change among 307 pre-diabetes adults following a six-session group-based intervention to promote healthier living (Critchley et al, 2012). They reported that, despite the fact that participation in the six small group's psychosocial-educational sessions was significantly associated with improvement in self-efficacy, it did not become a mediator between this participation and change in healthy diet and physical activity behaviour.…”

Section: Self-efficacy and Non-communicable Disease Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven studies examined the relationship between self-efficacy and behaviour related to healthy eating and/or exercise or physical activities to non-communicable control diseases; three studies were on osteoporosis prevention (Ievers-Landis et al, 2003;Piaseu et al, 2002;Sharma et al, 2010) and the rest are on coronary heart disease (L. E. Burke et al, 2005) hypertension, type-2 diabetes (Critchley et al, 2012) 3 and chronic orthopaedic conditions like arthritis (Fuchs et al, 2012). There is also one study related to breast self-examination behavior (Luszczynska, 2004).…”

Section: Self-efficacy and Non-communicable Disease Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the issues affecting the overall dataset are the studies that relied on self-reported, and therefore prone to reporting bias, measures on eating and physical activity behavior (Chariyeva et al, 2013;Critchley, Hardie, & Moore, 2012;Luszczynska, 2004;Piaseu, Schepp, & Belza, 2002;Strathdee et al, 2009). Selective sampling in recruitment to a particular group of participants (Ievers-Landis et al, 2003;Piaseu et al, 2002;Sharma et al, 2010) or being geographically limited thus reducing generalizability of the study.…”

Section: Study Validity and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Association between Self-Efficacy and Health Behaviour in Disease Control: A Systematic Review

Isa¹,

Muhamad²,

Mustapha³

et al. 2017

GJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Self-efficacy is defined as his or her belief of their capacity to produce specific performance attainments where represent the ability of positive and negative control over their own motivation, behavior, and social environment. Interventions to increase self-efficacy are a potentially effective way of changing health behavior towards attractive results, however the subject has not been systematically reviewed. This review aims to assess the relationship between self-efficacy and change in good health behaviour. Methods:A comprehensive and extensive search of four bibliographic data bases was conducted for papers reporting health promotion and educational interventions that explicitly targeted self-efficacy in order to change health behaviour in achieving better disease control. Results:Out of 314 studies, 13 were included in the review. Of these, 8 were found to have significant association between self-efficacy and specific health behaviours. However, 5 studies failed to show any significant prediction towards health behavior. Another 6 studies showed either significant mediation effect or indirect relationship of self-efficacy and health behaviours. Conclusions:Self-efficacy appears to be an important psychosocial construct that may directly or indirectly affect health behaviour to control diseases. Self-efficacy may also function as a link between effective health promotion and educational interventions and health behaviour change in disease control.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Self-efficacy and Non-communicable Disease Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Self-efficacy and Non-communicable Disease Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Validity and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Association between Self-Efficacy and Health Behaviour in Disease Control: A Systematic Review

Isa¹,

Muhamad²,

Mustapha³

et al. 2017

GJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Increased knowledge has recently been found to be the most important determinant of successful change in physical activity behaviour among individuals with pre-diabetes. Critchley et al, (2012) did not find that a positive mood, self-efficacy, or motivation were determinants of change; nevertheless, they did act as significant mediators between greater knowledge and behaviour change. In the present data, increased knowledge appeared to play a major role in determining participants' motivation to increase physical activity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

‘I saw what the future direction would be…’: Experiences of diabetes risk and physical activity after diabetes screening

Vähäsarja

Kasila

Kettunen

et al. 2014

British J Health Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To improve understanding of how individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes experience the risk of diabetes and how these experiences relate to the adoption of physical activity as a protective behaviour. Design A qualitative study using semi‐structured interview with individuals identified by screening as at high risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods Fourteen individuals, aged 40–64, were interviewed twice, with a 2‐year interval between. Participants' experiences of their risk of diabetes and physical activity were assessed. The transcribed interview data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. Results Two themes emerged from the data: a threatening risk perception and a rejected risk perception. The threatening risk perception occurred when the risk was unexpected by the participant, but became internalized through the screening procedure. The threatening perception also involved a commitment to increase physical activity to prevent diabetes. However, short‐term anxiety and subsequently emerging hopelessness were also part of this perception. The rejected risk perception involved indifference and scepticism regarding the risk. Here, physical activity behaviour and cognitions appeared to remain unchanged. Rejection also involved difficulties in accepting one's high‐risk identity. The rejecting group lacked motivation for increased physical activity, while the other group showed determination regarding increased physical activity, often leading to success. Conclusion Perceptions of the risk of diabetes emerged as threatening or as rejected. Participants' perceptions reflected varying and intertwining emotional, cognitive, and behavioural mechanisms for coping with the risk, all of which should be recognized in promoting physical activity among high‐risk individuals. What is already known on this subject? Diabetes screening has few adverse psychological effects on screened individuals. Diabetes can be prevented by increased physical activity and modest weight loss among high‐risk individuals. The evidence on the effects of screening on protective behaviour is limited and inconsistent.What does this study add? High‐risk individuals' threatening perception of risk appears encouraging increased physical activity. Individuals having problems in adjusting to high‐risk identification may not be motivated to engage in physical activity for prevention. Failure to achieve the outcomes expected from lifestyle changes may lead people with threatening risk perception to a sense of hopelessness.

show abstract

The impact of pre‐diabetes diagnosis on behaviour change: an integrative literature review

Youngs¹,

Gillibrand

Phillips

2016

Practical Diabetes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tel: 07747654280Key points:1. Type 2 diabetes can be preventable.2. Diagnosis of pre-diabetes or at risk status may enable behaviour change.3. Increased provision of education and support is required to motivate lifestyle change in the person with pre-diabetes.Key words: Type 2 diabetes; pre-diabetes; motivation; lifestyle; education; support Abstract Type 2 diabetes is a growing global problem that not only affects individuals but has an impact upon the economic health of countries 1 . The number of people developing type 2 diabetes can be reduced by up to by 80%; this can be achieved by targeting those who are "at risk" 2. This reduction can be achieved by appropriate lifestyle changes to diet and physical activity 3. It is not known what the impact of being informed that you have prediabetes has on a patients motivation to make appropriate lifestyle changes.The aim of this study was to assess whether having the diagnosis of pre-diabetes encourages or empowers people to make appropriate lifestyle changes to prevent progression to a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.Using a systematic approach, an integrative literature review was undertaken, using a standard retrieval and appraisal method. The studies demonstrated that pre-diabetes was found to be a challenging concept by patients and nurse alike. Lack of knowledge and support, along with patient's perceived barriers had an impact upon the various motivation and self-efficacy behaviours towards lifestyle changes.

show abstract

Examining the Psychological Pathways to Behavior Change in a Group-Based Lifestyle Program to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes

Cited by 38 publications

References 25 publications

Association between Self-Efficacy and Health Behaviour in Disease Control: A Systematic Review

Association between Self-Efficacy and Health Behaviour in Disease Control: A Systematic Review

‘I saw what the future direction would be…’: Experiences of diabetes risk and physical activity after diabetes screening

The impact of pre‐diabetes diagnosis on behaviour change: an integrative literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About