2017
DOI: 10.25115/ejrep.40.15124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the psychometric properties of the Emotional Regulation Checklist in 4- and 5-year-old preschoolers

Abstract: Introduction. Emotinal Regulation Checklist is frequently used to determine emotional de-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moraes, Anjos, and Marinho (2012) conducted a systematic review of several silhouette scales for self-assessment of nutritional status; they found high correlations between the scales’ scores and nutritional status in adults, but low correlations between these variables in children. More recently, Danisman, Esra, Zeynep, and Yaya (2016) studied the psychometric properties of the Emotional Regulation Checklist in 5-year-old children. When these authors analyzed the factor structure of the scale through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the original factor model did not fit the data, although the battery approach yielded adequate psychometric properties of the test (Reis et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moraes, Anjos, and Marinho (2012) conducted a systematic review of several silhouette scales for self-assessment of nutritional status; they found high correlations between the scales’ scores and nutritional status in adults, but low correlations between these variables in children. More recently, Danisman, Esra, Zeynep, and Yaya (2016) studied the psychometric properties of the Emotional Regulation Checklist in 5-year-old children. When these authors analyzed the factor structure of the scale through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the original factor model did not fit the data, although the battery approach yielded adequate psychometric properties of the test (Reis et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%