2022
DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2021.0133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Relationship Between LGBTQ-Supportive School Health Policies and Practices and Psychosocial Health Outcomes of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, and while the effect of the pandemic is unknown, findings are consistent with previous research indicating that prevalence of connectedness is lowest among youths who have experienced racism at school ( 10 ); identify as LGBQ+ ( 11 ); and are multiply marginalized and underrepresented (i.e., youths who hold minority racial and ethnic and sexual identities) ( 7 ). Creating school environments that intentionally focus on students with marginalized identities by proactively addressing discrimination and fostering inclusivity supports positive health and development for all students and might be an important mechanism by which to eliminate inequities in school connectedness ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, and while the effect of the pandemic is unknown, findings are consistent with previous research indicating that prevalence of connectedness is lowest among youths who have experienced racism at school ( 10 ); identify as LGBQ+ ( 11 ); and are multiply marginalized and underrepresented (i.e., youths who hold minority racial and ethnic and sexual identities) ( 7 ). Creating school environments that intentionally focus on students with marginalized identities by proactively addressing discrimination and fostering inclusivity supports positive health and development for all students and might be an important mechanism by which to eliminate inequities in school connectedness ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies that improve school environments for LGBQ+ students are well established and include school policies and practices such as having student-led clubs (e.g., Gender and Sexualities Alliances [GSAs]), enforced antiharassment policies, identified safe spaces for students, and professional development for school staff on the importance of inclusivity. These strategies create school environments that benefit all students and have been linked to improved health and development outcomes for both LGBQ+ students and their heterosexual peers ( 12 ). Recent data from CDC’s School Health Profiles survey indicate that, although approximately all schools prohibit harassment of LGBQ+ students and 80% identify safe spaces, only 44% of secondary schools have GSAs and 30% provide training to teachers and school staff on supporting LGBQ+ students ( https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/profiles/pdf/2020/CDC-Profiles-2020.pdf ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By disaggregating sexual minority youths and including identity and sex of sexual contacts (i.e., youths who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, questioning, or other and youths who have sexual contact with same-sex partners only and partners of both sexes), this report adds further context to national prevalence estimates of violence victimization against sexual minority youths; for example, students who identify as bisexual and students who have sexual contact with both sexes experience violence victimization at higher rates. School-based strategies to support LGBQ+ youths have been found to be associated with decreases in IVV among both LGBQ+ youths and heterosexual youths, contributing to safer school environments for all students ( 12 ). The consistent disparities in violence by sexual orientation found in this analysis highlight the important role of LGBTQ+ supportive practices in reducing experiences of violence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study with a similar protocol, GSAs led to less bullying in a sample of 1061 youth [60]. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey was analyzed for the effects of gay straight alliance or similar clubs for connecting LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ youth (N=75,638) [61]. The data suggested that the GSAs were helpful for both the LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ youth for reducing suiciderelated behavior and illicit drug use.…”
Section: Interventions School Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%