2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the relationship between morphological variation and modeled broadband scattering responses of reef-associated fishes from the Southeast United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among models, numerical ones such as BEM and FEM are considered the more precise than approximate models such as the KRM 20 but they are computationally expensive (several hours or days for a single fish using consumer equipment), as a consequence, approximation models are often preferred. However, several authors demonstrated their inability to capture finer scale variations which can affect the overall backscatter 20,47 when compared to numerical models 52 . In this study, we demonstrated small divergences between numerical models (FEM and BEM) and approximate analytical KRM model in the broadband pattern up to 2 dB in mean TS at 38 kHz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among models, numerical ones such as BEM and FEM are considered the more precise than approximate models such as the KRM 20 but they are computationally expensive (several hours or days for a single fish using consumer equipment), as a consequence, approximation models are often preferred. However, several authors demonstrated their inability to capture finer scale variations which can affect the overall backscatter 20,47 when compared to numerical models 52 . In this study, we demonstrated small divergences between numerical models (FEM and BEM) and approximate analytical KRM model in the broadband pattern up to 2 dB in mean TS at 38 kHz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying acoustic techniques to monitor fine‐scale distribution of multispecies assemblages around benthic structure, such as reefs, still presents significant challenges (Boswell et al 2020), as it is common for multiple species to forage together in the water column (Lukoschek and McCormick 2000). This school heterogeneity significantly complicates traditional fisheries acoustic approaches (Boswell et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying acoustic techniques to monitor fine‐scale distribution of multispecies assemblages around benthic structure, such as reefs, still presents significant challenges (Boswell et al 2020), as it is common for multiple species to forage together in the water column (Lukoschek and McCormick 2000). This school heterogeneity significantly complicates traditional fisheries acoustic approaches (Boswell et al 2020). Although there exists high variability in translating school thickness to actual fish abundance (Zwolinski et al 2009), the high correlation of this variable with mean volume backscatter from the split‐beam echosounder suggests that school thickness can be a useful representation for the relative distribution of schools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%