2020
DOI: 10.1177/0963721420964095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Role of General Cognitive Skills in Language Processing: A Window Into Complex Cognition

Abstract: When we use language, we combine sounds, signs, and letters into words that then form sentences, which together tell a story. Both language production and language comprehension rely on representations that need to be continuously and rapidly activated, selected, and combined. These representations are specific to language, but many processes that regulate their use, such as inhibition of competitors or updating of working memory, are domain-general abilities that apply across different kinds of tasks. Here, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous fMRI studies localized orthographic effects based on neighborhood measures (similar to the OLD20 measure used here) to regions implicated in orthographic processing (Braun et al., 2015; Yarkoni, Speer, et al., 2008) and/or to domain general regions (Braun et al., 2015; Fiebach et al., 2007; Yarkoni, Speer, et al., 2008). The sources found here fall into the latter category of regions previously associated with executive functions (e.g., Duncan, 2013), which might support (predictive) language processing (e.g., Federmeier et al., 2020; Ryskin et al., 2020; Ye & Zhou, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Previous fMRI studies localized orthographic effects based on neighborhood measures (similar to the OLD20 measure used here) to regions implicated in orthographic processing (Braun et al., 2015; Yarkoni, Speer, et al., 2008) and/or to domain general regions (Braun et al., 2015; Fiebach et al., 2007; Yarkoni, Speer, et al., 2008). The sources found here fall into the latter category of regions previously associated with executive functions (e.g., Duncan, 2013), which might support (predictive) language processing (e.g., Federmeier et al., 2020; Ryskin et al., 2020; Ye & Zhou, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The active comprehension processes that I described in Section 4 are notable for being facultative—employed strategically and in a manner that seems to require resources that are not readily available to all comprehenders or under all circumstances. Moreover, the kinds of prediction, selection, revision, and sequencing processes that characterize active comprehension are associated with effects that also arise in other domains and that have been linked to general attentional and control systems (see reviews by Aydelott et al., 2005; Federmeier et al., 2020). For example, predictive language contexts yield decreases in alpha power leading up to a potentially predictable stimulus (Rommers et al., 2017)—the same kind of effects that have been linked more generally to attentional allocation (Haegens et al., 2012).…”
Section: Multiple Modes Of Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources found here fall into the latter category of regions previously associated with executive functions (e.g., Duncan, 2013), which might support (predictive) language processing (e.g., Ye and Zhou, 2009;Federmeier et al, 2020;Ryskin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Neurophysiological Mechanisms Of Context-dependent Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 59%