2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0314-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the use of process evaluations of randomised controlled trials of complex interventions addressing chronic disease in primary health care—a systematic review protocol

Abstract: BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) of complex interventions in primary health care (PHC) are needed to provide evidence-based programmes to achieve the Declaration of Alma Ata goal of making PHC equitable, accessible and universal and to effectively address the rising burden from chronic disease. Process evaluations of these RCTs can provide insight into the causal mechanisms of complex interventions, the contextual factors, and inform as to whether an intervention is ineffective due to implementati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality appraisal was based on underlying study design of the paper. Qualitative process evaluations of randomized control trials (RCTs) were evaluated as qualitative studies . The number of “Yes” answers were divided by the number of applicable criteria to derive a percentage score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality appraisal was based on underlying study design of the paper. Qualitative process evaluations of randomized control trials (RCTs) were evaluated as qualitative studies . The number of “Yes” answers were divided by the number of applicable criteria to derive a percentage score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the multilevel nature of some interventions, an organizational level indicator, adoption, was also included from the RE-AIM framework [ 19 ]. The cost of interventions was also documented to indicate the level of implementation and transferability of interventions, particularly to other LMICs with limiting funding [ 23 ]. Table 1 describes the process evaluation dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional challenge of evaluating Facebook groups is that many types of data, including both quantitative and qualitative, must be collected to assess engagement and effectiveness. If the Facebook group is a component of a multicomponent program, process evaluations can potentially provide insight into the causal mechanisms of such interventions and enable fine-grained understanding of the individual components [ 57 , 58 ]. Process evaluation methodology is underutilized in multicomponent intervention research, and this challenges research translation to identify essential intervention components from those that are not as important [ 59 ].…”
Section: Development Implementation and Evaluation Of Facebook Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%