2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-020-10106-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining vocabulary, reading comprehension, and content knowledge instruction during fourth grade social studies teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think these findings are important for several reasons. First, we know that social studies teachers value content learning and literacy outcomes (Capin et al, 2020;Swanson et al, 2016). Findings from this study revealed that teachers in the treatment conditions provided both literacy learning and content learning-thus not sacrificing content on the path to improved literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We think these findings are important for several reasons. First, we know that social studies teachers value content learning and literacy outcomes (Capin et al, 2020;Swanson et al, 2016). Findings from this study revealed that teachers in the treatment conditions provided both literacy learning and content learning-thus not sacrificing content on the path to improved literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although many teachers include vocabulary and reading comprehension practices during social studies, they are often misaligned with the evidence base and lack explicit instruction and strategy instruction (Capin et al, 2020;Swanson et al, 2016). In addition, teachers often rely on lecture and relatively narrow vocabulary instruction (e.g., providing a student-friendly definition and using examples and nonexamples).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used data from a multiple-cohort, randomized control trial (Capin et al, 2021) conducted to examine the efficacy of STRIVE in elementary schools. Within each of three cohorts, schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: RPD ( n = 26), SPD ( n = 28), or BAU ( n = 27).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While teachers appreciate knowing about instructional practices that are effective for a specific subgroup of their students (e.g., students with reading problems), they consistently report that differentiating instruction for the range of learners in their classrooms is challenging and that they are looking for impactful practices that meet the needs of this increasingly diverse group (Boardman et al, 2005). STRIVE is an evidence-based PD model designed to support teachers to integrate a set of instructional practices associated with improved vocabulary, comprehension, and content learning with upper elementary students (Simmons et al, 2010; Capin et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation