The authors examined abstracts written by graduate students for their research proposals as a requirement for a course in research methods in a distance learning MLIS program. The students learned under three instructional conditions that involved varying levels of access to worked examples created from abstracts representing research in the LIS field. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) detected significantly higher scores in areas related to fluency in describing the research design and the required elements of a research proposal in the groups with more exposure to worked examples, while the rhetorical skills necessary to compose a succinct abstract and to relate a proposal to implications in the field were not affected.central tenet of graduate education is the expectation that students will be able to generate new knowledge from the research related to the discipline in which any given graduate student has elected to pursue study. The development of the skills needed by the students to meet this expectation requires a curriculum including coursework that exposes students to the research in the field and, ultimately, prepares students to demonstrate that they can transform that research into an original thesis. To this end, the culminating activities in many graduate programs include the submission of a thesis or a capstone paper. To help students to succeed in meeting exit requirements such as these, most graduate schools provide formal instruction in research methods. The hope is that, beyond graduation, these newly minted professionals will enter their fields armed with the tools they need to conduct research when the opportunities arise.In the library and information science (LIS) discipline, the need for students and practicing librarians to acquire experience in research methods has resulted in recomdoi:10.5860/crl.75.6.822 crl13-526