2010
DOI: 10.2172/988597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Example Procedures for Developing Acceptance-Range Criteria for BESTEST-EX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These disagreements should not be cause for evaluating a tested software result as unsatisfactory. Judkoff et al (2010b) discuss additional details about development and example application of example acceptance criteria. Figure 3 shows only the results and acceptance ranges for the building physics test cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These disagreements should not be cause for evaluating a tested software result as unsatisfactory. Judkoff et al (2010b) discuss additional details about development and example application of example acceptance criteria. Figure 3 shows only the results and acceptance ranges for the building physics test cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A given audit model is tested using specified inputs; resulting outputs are compared with reference results from three detailed simulation programs (EnergyPlus, DOE-2.1E, and SUNREL). Tested program results may also be compared with accompanying example acceptance criteria (Judkoff et al 2010b), or with other results generated using the test procedure.…”
Section: Building Physics Test Cases With Known Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A given audit model is tested using specified inputs; resulting outputs are compared with reference results from three detailed simulation programs (EnergyPlus version 3.1, DOE-2.1E version JJHirsch PC 2.1En136, and SUNREL version 1.14) presented in Appendix G. Tested program results may also be compared with example acceptance criteria (Judkoff et al 2010), or other results generated using this test procedure.…”
Section: Building Physics Test Cases With Fully Known Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%