2020
DOI: 10.1090/conm/745/15022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of wild ramification in an enriched Riemann–Hurwitz formula

Abstract: M. Levine proved an enrichment of the classical Riemann-Hurwitz formula to an equality in the Grothendieck-Witt group of quadratic forms. In its strongest form, Levine's theorem includes a technical hypothesis on ramification relevant in positive characteristic. We consider wild ramification at points whose residue fields are non-separable extensions of the ground field k. We show an analogous Riemann-Hurwitz formula, and consider an example suggested by S. Saito.Date: December 11, 2018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1.2. Theorem 1.1 strengthens Theorem 1 of [BKW18], removing hypothesis (2) entirely. It also simplifies the proofs of [KW17, Theorem 1] and [SW18, Theorems 1 and 2]: it is no longer necessary to show that the sections of certain vector bundles with non-isolated isolated zeros are codimension 2, as in [KW17,Lemmas 54,56,57], and [SW18, Lemma 1], because n PH (V, σ) is independent of σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Remark 1.2. Theorem 1.1 strengthens Theorem 1 of [BKW18], removing hypothesis (2) entirely. It also simplifies the proofs of [KW17, Theorem 1] and [SW18, Theorems 1 and 2]: it is no longer necessary to show that the sections of certain vector bundles with non-isolated isolated zeros are codimension 2, as in [KW17,Lemmas 54,56,57], and [SW18, Lemma 1], because n PH (V, σ) is independent of σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The local index in X$\infty _X$, on the other hand, is 2h(0)$\left< -\frac{2}{h^{\prime }(0)} \right>$, where h(z):=zfalse(z2g+1f(z1)false)$h(z):=z(z^{2g+1}f(z^{-1}))$. It is worth noting that in [25, Section 11] and [6], indp(s)$\mathrm{ind}_p(s)$ and efalse(scriptEfalse)$e(\mathcal {E})$ were computed by comparing the canonical bundle of X against that of double-struckP1$\mathbb {P}^1$.…”
Section: Local Arithmetic Inflection Formulaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other results along these lines include [Hoy14], [Lev17], [Lev18a], [Lev18b], [Wen18], [SW18], [BKW18], and this is an active area of research.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%