Exceeding the Ontario Building Code for low-rise residential buildings: Economic and environmental implications

Abstract

Always cite the published version, so the author(s) will receive recognition through services that track citation counts, e.g. Scopus. If you need to cite the page number of the author manuscript from TSpace because you cannot access the published version, then cite the TSpace version in addition to the published version using the permanent URI (handle) found on the record page.This article was made openly accessible by U of T Faculty. Please tell us how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Abstract:The residential sector accounts for approximately one fifth of Canada's secondary energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, addressing the energy efficiency of residential buildings has a significant role to play in reducing the nation's overall greenhouse gas emissions. The Ontario Building Code has recently been updated to reflect a more stringent energy performance standard. A home built to the prescribed minimum requirements will perform at a relatively high standard with respect to energy use when compared to homes built less than a decade ago. This paper explores three energy efficiency upgrade options which improve upon the energy efficiency of the 2012 Ontario Building Code. The "controlled ventilation" upgrade involved tightening up the building envelope and adding heat recovery to waste air streams, and two additional upgrade options were developed to meet the high performance targets of the R-2000 standard. While the upgrades explored did not show financial benefit for individual home owners at current utility rates, if the benefits to society are considered, the upgrades are an economically efficient method of reducing greenhouse gas emissions owed to energy consumption. In addition to highlighting the need for a broader approach to the cost-benefit analyses associated with these types of upgrades, this finding also warrants a discussion about how to transform the current housing market so that energy-efficient homes are more appropriately valued.

Embodied carbon emissions of office building: A case study of China's 78 office buildings

“…Against such background, it has become a major concern of the world, particularly of China to save energy and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions represented by CO2 [2]. Globally, the construction industry consumes about 30%~40% energy while producing 40%~50% GHGs [3].…”

Bamboo: An Engineered Alternative for Buildings in the Global South

“…The levels of extraction of construction minerals has also reached new levels in the XXI century, highlighting not only the problem of the availability, but also the accessibility to those resources [34]. For instance, the production of construction materials such as cement and aggregates is using 30 to 40% of global energy production [35] and under the current practices it means that their production process releases 30% of global GHG emissions [36,37]. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the potential environmental benefits from the use of low-carbon alternative construction materials, amongst these bio-based materials such as bamboo and timber.…”

Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings

“…The levels of extraction of construction minerals has also reached new levels in the 21st century, highlighting not only the problem of the resources' availability, but also their accessibility [8]. For instance, the production of construction materials such as cement and aggregates is using 30% to 40% of world's energy production [9], and under the current practices, this means that they account for 30% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [10,11].…”