Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic reduction and double row‐suture bridge for large‐sized greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus

Abstract

PurposeCurrently, there is limited information on the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double‐row suture bridge fixation for large greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double‐row suture bridge fixation for these fractures, hypothesizing that arthroscopic reduction and double‐row suture bridge fixation is a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment for large greater tuberosity fractures.MethodsThis retrospective study analysed patients with large greater tuberosity fractures (fracture fragment ≥30 mm in diameter) who underwent arthroscopic reduction and double‐row suture bridge fixation and had a follow‐up period exceeding 2 years. The anatomic reduction was confirmed by assessing the step‐off on radiographs immediately after surgery, and the radiologic union time was recorded. At the final follow‐up, range of motion and functional outcome scores were evaluated. Additionally, any surgery‐related complications were evaluated.ResultsFifteen patients with a mean follow‐up of 57.7 ± 23.1 months were included in the study. The mean fracture fragment size was 32.5 ± 2.4 mm, with a mean displacement of 5.1 ± 1.6 mm. Immediately postsurgery, 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) had a fracture step‐off of <3 mm, with an average union time of 3 months. At the final follow‐up, patients demonstrated excellent outcomes, with an average forward flexion of 167 ± 9.7° and external rotation of 70 ± 16.3. Functional outcome scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.001). No major surgery‐related complications were reported.ConclusionsArthroscopic reduction and double‐row suture bridge fixation for large‐sized greater tuberosity fractures is safe and shows good fracture reduction and excellent clinical outcomes. Therefore, this surgical method can be considered an alternative to open reduction for large greater tuberosity fractures.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.