1997
DOI: 10.1216/rmjm/1181071964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excellent Rings, Henselian Rings, and the Approximation Property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we claim that A may, under certain circumstances, be quasi-excellent, even though it cannot be excellent. To show this, we first present the following definitions, adapted from[9]:Definition 2.12. A local ring A is quasi-excellent if, for all P ∈ Spec A, the ring A ⊗ A L is regular for every purely inseparable finite field extension L of k(P ) = A P /P A P .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we claim that A may, under certain circumstances, be quasi-excellent, even though it cannot be excellent. To show this, we first present the following definitions, adapted from[9]:Definition 2.12. A local ring A is quasi-excellent if, for all P ∈ Spec A, the ring A ⊗ A L is regular for every purely inseparable finite field extension L of k(P ) = A P /P A P .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If information regarding terminology or notation beyond what is provided here is required, either the text of Matsumura [11] or Eisenbud [3] will serve as an adequate reference in most cases. For the properties of excellent rings though, Grothendieck [7] and especially the recent paper by Rotthaus [12] are more thorough sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Letting R denote the completion of R with respect to I, it follows that I is generated by a regular sequence if and only if I R is, for R −→ R is faithfully flat. Thus, it suffices to show that the hypotheses of Theorem 5 apply to I R and R. The hypotheses on R guarantee that, in particular, R is a catenary local domain (see [12,Theorem 1.11]), and it is clear that condition (i) of * holds since R/I R = R/I is S 2 and reduced. Second, I R/ I R 2 = I R/I 2 R = I/I 2 ⊗ R is free over R/I R = R/I ⊗ R, so condition (iii) is also satisfied.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Define, for any P ∈ Spec A, k(P ) = A P /P A P . As noted in [5], we can consider only the purely inseparable finite field extensions L of k(P ). The following is a consequence of Theorem 31.6 and the definition of formally equidimensional in [4, pp.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%