2022
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess mortality caused by the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts birth numbers in European countries

Abstract: Study question How did the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affect live birth numbers in Europe? SUMMARY ANSWER In 14 European countries with validated data sets on live birth numbers during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, excess mortality was inversely correlated with live birth numbers. What is known already Since March 2020, in order to minimise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decline we found is larger than the one previously described by De Geyter et al (2022) in 11 European countries, which is mainly explained by a difference in the methods used to assess the variation in births in Europe. De Geyter et al (2022) used P-scores to compare a 3-month period (October to December) with a previous reference for that period, whereas we used a comparison of monthly rates to identify the month with the largest decline in birth rate (January 2021). They also found an association between an excess of mortality in the general population and a decline in births after the first wave of the pandemic (De Geyter et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The decline we found is larger than the one previously described by De Geyter et al (2022) in 11 European countries, which is mainly explained by a difference in the methods used to assess the variation in births in Europe. De Geyter et al (2022) used P-scores to compare a 3-month period (October to December) with a previous reference for that period, whereas we used a comparison of monthly rates to identify the month with the largest decline in birth rate (January 2021). They also found an association between an excess of mortality in the general population and a decline in births after the first wave of the pandemic (De Geyter et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…This trend in birth rates seems to be similar to what has been described in other high-income countries or following previous crises (Aassve et al, 2020;Ullah et al, 2020;Aassve et al, 2021;Stout et al, 2021). The decline we found is larger than the one previously described by De Geyter et al (2022) in 11 European countries, which is mainly explained by a difference in the methods used to assess the variation in births in Europe. De Geyter et al (2022) used P-scores to compare a 3-month period (October to December) with a previous reference for that period, whereas we used a comparison of monthly rates to identify the month with the largest decline in birth rate (January 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A more recent study from Australia showed decline in births <34 weeks GA during 2020–21 lockdowns but without significant change for births <28 weeks GA ( 9 ). A consortium of European nations, report decline in live birth rates, some with a subsequent rebound in early 2021 and excess COVID mortality as a putative reason for declining live births ( 10 , 11 ). Recent (2020–21) Canadian surveillance data suggest increased preterm birth risk among 6,012 SARS-CoV-2–affected pregnancies (11.05% vs. 6.76%; relative risk, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.52–1.76]), inclusive of milder disease not requiring hospitalization, compared to unaffected contemporaneous pregnancies ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%